Skip to main content
. 2004 Jul;17(3):571–580. doi: 10.1128/CMR.17.3.571-580.2004

TABLE 1.

Sensitivity and specificity of RADTs compared with cultures

Culture medium RADT method Sample size (no. of patients) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Refer- ence
BAP MMa 767 88.6 97.8 60
BAP MM 277 86 95 73
BAP MM 1,103 92.4 99.6 35
BAP MM 318 91.4 97 34
BAP + THB MM 520 94.8 100 10
BAP MM 384 93 98 79
BAP + THB OIA 200 80 89 42
BAP OIA 301 91.4 95.6 62
THB OIA 301 90.4 94.1 62
BAP OIA 505 93.2 95.0 22
BAP OIA 505 94.8 98.8 22
BAP OIA 262 77 97 68
BAP OIA 690 97 94 16
THB OIA 690 95 97 16
THB OIA 475 97.4 95.6 32
THB OIA 800 98.9 98.4 32
THB OIA 424 84.2 95.7 15
BAP OIA 233 79.5 96.9 59
BAP OIA 86 85 95 71
BAP + THB OIA 363 89 96.5 45
BAP + THB OIA 263 77 62 33
THB OIA 413 89 93 75
BAP + THB OIA 801 91.5 94.8 35
BAP + THB OIA 500 83 89 63
BAP OIA 77 78 90 1
BAP + THB OIA 302 75.5 97.1 30
BAP + THB OIA 2,113 84 93 24
BAP + THB OIA 520 86.1 97.1 10
BAP + THB EIA 302 92.6 92.8 30
BAP EIA 182 95.5 96.3 41
BAP EIA 777 89 96 20
BAP EIA 1,449 52.6 98.2 86
BAP EIA 258 95 100 70
BAP EIA 258 87 100 70
BAP + RADT EIA 322 80 64
BAP EIA 351 96.9 97.4 18
BAP EIA 454 89.9 95.8 47
a

MM, molecular biology-based method.