Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Proteins. 2015 May 8;83(6):1151–1164. doi: 10.1002/prot.24808

Fig. 7. Comparison of runtime for iMinDEE vs. two new algorithms that improve pairwise bounds during the CSPD search.

Fig. 7

iMinDEE, PartCR, and HOT were tested on 73 protein core designs. iMinDEE failed on 28 of the designs (designs to the right of the dotted line), while PartCR and HOT completed all of the designs successfully. The bottom inverted graph shows the number of conformations that remained after iMinDEE pruning for each design system.