Table 2.
Factors | Model 1: Mammography, Everb
|
Model 2: Pap Examination, Everc
|
Model 3: Pap Examination, < 1 yd
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | 95% CI | P | OR | 95% CI | P | OR | 95% CI | P | |
Acculturatione | 2.220 | 0.222, 22.161 | .497 | 0.413 | 0.100, 1.700 | .220 | 3.810 | 1.157, 12.545 | .028* |
Body mass index | 1.156 | 0.884, 1.512 | .290 | 0.948 | 0.863, 1.041 | .262 | 0.958 | 0.885, 1.036 | .283 |
Blood pressure screening ever | |||||||||
No | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
Yes | 1.083 | 0.102, 11.544 | .948 | 2.945 | 0.637, 13.617 | .167 | 0.432 | 0.152, 1.231 | .116 |
Physical examination ever | |||||||||
No | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
Yes | 0.406 | 0.026, 6.356 | .521 | 1.653 | 0.337, 8.097 | .535 | 1.948 | 0.671, 5.651 | .220 |
Breast self-examination ever | |||||||||
No | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
Yes | 6.326 | 0.643, 62.274 | .114 | 1.171 | 0.246, 5.587 | .843 | 2.819 | 1.033, 7.695 | .043* |
Health insurance | |||||||||
No | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
Yes | 2.366 | 0.214, 26.126 | .482 | 2.446 | 0.450, 13.293 | .300 | 5.575 | 2.017, 15.406 | .001** |
Farmworker statusf | |||||||||
Migrant | — | — | — | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
Seasonal | — | — | — | 0.525 | 0.133, 2.800 | .525 | 1.208 | 0.445, 3.280 | .711 |
−2 log likelihood | 23.7999 | 56.109 | 105.436 | ||||||
Nagelkerke R2 | .267 | .111 | .306 | ||||||
Model χ2 | 5.297 (P > .05) | 5.318 (P > .05) | 24.492 (P < .01) |
Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Mammography and Pap examination ever were determined through self-report survey. Time since last Pap examination was determined through clinic chart review. Odds ratio of 1.00 indicates reference category.
n = 52; includes only women 40 years and older.
n = 105.
n = 94.
Possible range, 1–3; higher scores denote higher acculturation to English language.
Analysis was not done using this variable for the outcome of mammography screening, since 100% of seasonal farmworker women 40 years and older had received a mammogram in the past.
P < .05.
P ≤ .01.