Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Jul 9;26(8):399–401. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2015.06.004

Targeting Female Hormone Receptors as Cervical Cancer Therapy

Sang-Hyuk Chung 1
PMCID: PMC4526440  NIHMSID: NIHMS705119  PMID: 26163756

Abstract

While preventive methods for cervical cancer are effective, available therapies for advanced cervical cancers are ineffective. New experimental evidence points to weaknesses of prior studies and provides fresh molecular insights on the opposing roles of ERα and PR, which may be translated into valuable treatment for a subset of cervical cancers.

Keywords: human papillomavirus (HPV), estrogen receptor α (ERα), progesterone receptor (PR), cervical cancer, hormonal therapy

Cervical Cancer and Human Papillomavirus

Cervical cancer is the fourth most frequent cancer and fourth leading cause of cancer death in women, worldwide. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) premalignant lesions precede cervical cancer. CINs (CIN1-CIN3) are effectively treated by simple surgeries, but they increase the risk for complications in future pregnancy. Current therapies for cervical cancer are ineffective for advanced or recurrent cervical cancer. Thus, the development of more effective therapy for cervical cancer and CIN is urgently needed.

High-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) is a major etiological factor and HPV vaccines reduce the likelihood of CIN and cervical cancer [1]. The HPV oncogenes E6 and E7 are necessary for HPV-induced cervical carcinogenesis. Persistent HPV infection is occasionally established when the immune system fails to resolve initial infections. CIN3 develops only in 14-40% of women with persistent HPV infections, and the rate of progression from CIN3 to invasive cancer is approximately 30% in unscreened population, suggesting that CIN lesions can regress spontaneously [1-3]. Consequently, less than 0.1% of HPV-infected women succumb to cervical cancer. Despite the oncogenic activities of E6 and E7, primary rodent cells are transformed by high-risk HPV DNAs only in the presence of other factors such as a glucocorticoid or activated Ras [1]. Furthermore, cervical neoplastic diseases do not develop spontaneously in transgenic mice expressing E6 and E7 [2]. These observations indicate that other factors, in addition to HPV, are required for cervical carcinogenesis.

This article focuses on the roles of the female sex hormones estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4) in cervical carcinogenesis, and describes how their receptors and/or downstream gene products may be targets for therapy.

Female Hormones and Their Receptors in Cervical Cancer

Long-term oral contraceptives use or multiple parities increases the risk for cervical cancer in HPV-infected women [2]. Since most oral contraceptives contain E2 and synthetic P4, and high levels of E2 and P4 are maintained during pregnancy, these observations implicate the female hormones in cervical cancer. E2 and P4 bind to and activate the estrogen (ERα and ERβ) and progesterone (PR-A and PR-B) receptors, respectively, ligand-dependent transcription factors that play key roles in numerous processes, including cancer. ERβ expression in the cervix is undetectable [4]. Thus, the E2–ERα and P4–PR signaling pathway may be involved in the progression and/or development of cervical cancer. Although the association between E2 replacement or selective ER modulator (SERM) therapy and cervical cancer is controversial [2], recent animal model studies, discussed below, support an oncogenic role of E2–ERα in cervical cancer.

Epidemiological studies looking at associations between medroxyprogesterone acetate (synthetic P4) and cervical cancer have been inconclusive, because data have not been stratified based on HPV infection. Although the results need verification, one study indicates that the use of medroxyprogesterone acetate decreases the risk of high-grade CINs among HPV-infected women [5]. Expression levels of ERα and PR do not necessarily reflect their activities, which depend on hormone concentrations. In addition, the levels of female hormones and hormone receptors continuously change due to biological (menstrual cycle), behavioral (hormonal contraceptive use) and environmental factors (estrogenic chemicals). Therefore, it is challenging to gain insight on a role for ERα and PR using studies based on a single measure of these receptors. Biomarkers for ERα, PR-A and PR-B activity in the cervix should be developed. It is also difficult to evaluate the role of E2–ERα or P4–PR in cervical cancer from several published in vitro studies, because of non-physiologic hormone doses and use of cervical cancer cell lines (e.g., SiHa, CaSki and HeLa) that do not express the receptors [2]. Published clinical trials also are not informative because of short follow-up periods, poor drug choice or underpowered statistical analyses [2, 6].

Mouse Model of Cervical Cancer

The Role of E2–ERα

Transgenic mice expressing HPV16 E6 (K14E6) or E7 (K14E7) have been extensively characterized in the context of cervical cancer [2]. Consistent with the notion that HPV alone is not sufficient, cervical cancer arises at high frequency only after chronic low-dose E2 treatment. The cervical diseases that arise in these mice recapitulate key aspects of human cervical cancer, including progressive development (CIN1, CIN2, CIN3 and cancer), cancer development in the transformation zone, and expression patterns of biomarkers similar to those of human malignancy [2]. In the HPV transgenic mice, ERα is necessary for cervical cancer development, and SERMs are efficient in treating the disease [2]. In the same mouse model, ablation of ERα expression in stromal cells results in complete regression of cervical neoplastic diseases [7], suggesting a paracrine mechanism. Since ERα is expressed in most cervical cancer stroma, this appears relevant to human cervical cancer [4, 8]. I speculate that ERα activates expression of secretory factors such as growth factors and cytokines in stromal cells that then activate oncogenic growth factor receptor signaling in neoplastic epithelial cells (Fig. 1). Identification of a growth factor receptor transmitting stromal ERα signal to epithelial cells would help the development of a targeted therapy for cervical cancer (Fig. 1). In this regard, amphiregulin—an epidermal growth factor receptor ligand—mediates paracrine effects of ERα during mammary gland development and carcinogenesis, and insulin-like growth factor 1 mediates E2-induced endometrial cell proliferation [9-11].

Figure 1. A proposed model of ERα mechanism in cervical cancer.

Figure 1

A gene(s) denoted as X that encodes for a secretory protein(s) is activated by ERα in stromal cells. The secretory protein activates a membrane receptor-mediated pathway in epithelial cells, which, in conjunction with E6 and E7, promotes initiation and progression of cervical cancer (CC). SERMs and receptor inhibitors could be effective in treating CC. It is proposed that E2-liganded ERα promotes the development of CIN, but the activated ERα in neoplastic epithelial cells inhibits further progression of CIN. BM, basement membrane.

ERα expression is gradually lost in neoplastic epithelial cells as cervical neoplastic disease progresses [4, 12]. Knockdown of ERα enhances invasion of the chick chorioallantoic membrane by cervical cancer cells [12]. These observations raise the possibility that stromal ERα is oncogenic, whereas epithelial ERα has dual functions, oncogenic in early stages and tumor-suppressive in late stages of cervical carcinogenesis (Fig. 1). This model further implies that stromal E2–ERα signaling promotes ERα-negative cervical cancer. Using the Cre-lox technology and the HPV transgenic mouse model, disease stage-specific function of ERα can be addressed by temporal ablation of ERα expression in neoplastic epithelial cells.

The Role of P4–PR

The cervical neoplastic disease burden in K14E7/PR+/+ mice is similar to that in K14E7/PR−/− mice [13]. This is as expected, since chronic E2 treatment inhibits the P4 surge (i.e., low P4 levels throughout a study period), and thus deletion of PR would have little effect (Fig. 2a). However, activation of PR by medroxyprogesterone acetate causes regression of CIN and cervical cancer in the HPV transgenic mouse model [13]. Based on these results, I hypothesize that PR acts as a ligand-dependent tumor suppressor in cervical cancer as in endometrial cancer [11]. While PR is expressed in 100% of cervical cancers arising in this mouse model, only 20-40% of human cervical cancers express PR [13, 14]. This difference may reflect hormonal status and/or other factors during neoplastic disease development. I speculate that PR cancers are frequent in humans because women with high P4 levels are more common than those with persistently high E2 levels. Persistently high P4 levels or cyclic P4 surges may provide selective pressure for rare PR cells (Fig. 2b-c); however, PR cervical cancer would rarely occur when high P4 levels persist because ERα activity would be minimal due to continuously low E2 levels. Such selection would not occur under a persistent E2 stimulation condition (Fig. 2a). Cervical carcinogenesis would be highly efficient under this hormonal condition as shown in the HPV transgenic mouse model [2]. In this regard, it might be important to determine whether HPV-infected women who do not have P4 surges are at higher risk (e.g., women with polycystic ovarian syndrome) for cervical cancer similar to endometrial cancer [11].

Figure 2. A model of the impact of the balance between E2 and P4 on cervical cancer.

Figure 2

An E2 surge promotes epithelial cell proliferation in female reproductive tracts and a following P4 surge reverses it [2, 11]. While E2 surges activates ERα and increases PR expression in the cervix [7], the activity of PR remains minimal because P4 levels are low during E2 surges. PR activity is heightened and ERα activity decreases during the following P4 surge. As ERα and PR downregulate their own expression, their expression levels are lower when activated by the hormones. These regulations occur in both stroma and epithelium. A model of the impact of normal and impaired hormonal cycle on cervical cancer is proposed. Tumor-promotive E2 action is mainly through stromal ERα (see Fig. 1). Epithelial PR likely mediates, at least in part, tumor-suppressive function of P4 and thus high P4 has little effect on PR cancer cells.

(a) Persistently high levels of E2 (high ERα activity) maintains low P4 levels (low PR activity). Under this hormonal condition, the development of PR+ cancers is more likely because there is no selective pressure for PR cancers.

(b) Cancer development is unlikely under this hormonal condition because of persistently low ERα activity. If it occurs nonetheless, it is likely PR cancer.

(c) E2 and P4 peak sequentially in turn and are never high concurrently during hormone cycle (left, luteal phase; right, proliferative phase). PR cells have advantage to become cancerous.

The thickness of arrows indicates the relative likelihood of an event. Note that HPV must be present in all three hormonal conditions for cancer development.

The results in the mouse model system suggest that proper use of ERα and PR ligands could be useful in the treatment of cervical cancer. If the cancer stroma expresses ERα, treatment with SERMs such as faslodex might be effective, regardless of expression of ERα in the cancer cells (Fig. 1). Co-treatment with SERMs and selective PR modulators (SPRMs) such as medroxyprogesterone acetate may be synergistic if both ERα and PR are expressed in appropriate cells.

Conclusions

Although there has been substantial improvement in our understanding of ERα and PR functions over the last decade, their function and mechanism in physiology and pathophysiology of the cervix is still underappreciated. Studies using the HPV transgenic mouse model have expanded understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of cervical cancer, and some of the underlying mechanisms that involve readily targetable hormone receptors. These advances support the hypothesis that epithelial P4–PR is tumor suppressive and that E2–ERα is oncogenic and tumor suppressive depending on cell types in which it functions. Next is to see if these findings are translatable to human disease via clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of SERMs and/or SPRMs in treating cervical cancer and CINs. As many of these classes of drugs are already in clinical use, the results could be translated quickly to clinical application, whereas further understanding of ERα and PR functions in cervical carcinogenesis will reveal new therapeutic targets for the disease.

Acknowledgement

I thank Dr. E. Brad Thompson for critically reading the manuscript. The work of SHC is supported by the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (RP120617) and the National Institutes of Health (CA188646).

Abbreviations

HPV

human papillomavirus

E2

estradiol

P4

progesterone

ER

estrogen receptor

PR

progesterone receptor

CIN

cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

References

  • 1.Howley PM, et al. Papillomaviruses. In: Knipe DM, Howley PM, editors. Fields Virology. 6th edn Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013. pp. 1662–1703. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chung SH, et al. Estrogen and ERalpha: culprits in cervical cancer? Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2010;21:504–511. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2010.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.McCredie MR, et al. Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:425–434. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70103-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.den Boon JA, et al. Molecular transitions from papillomavirus infection to cervical precancer and cancer: Role of stromal estrogen receptor signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1509322112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Harris TG, et al. Depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate and combined oral contraceptive use and cervical neoplasia among women with oncogenic human papillomavirus infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:489, e481–488. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.01.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hefler L, et al. Treatment with vaginal progesterone in women with low-grade cervical dysplasia: a phase II trial. Anticancer Res. 2010;30:1257–1261. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chung SH, et al. Requirement for Stromal Estrogen Receptor Alpha in Cervical Neoplasia. Horm Cancer. 2013;4:50–59. doi: 10.1007/s12672-012-0125-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kwasniewska A, et al. Estrogen and progesterone receptor expression in HPV-positive and HPV-negative cervical carcinomas. Oncology Rep. 2011;26:153–160. doi: 10.3892/or.2011.1256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ciarloni L, et al. Amphiregulin is an essential mediator of estrogen receptor alpha function in mammary gland development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:5455–5460. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611647104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kariagina A, et al. Amphiregulin mediates estrogen, progesterone, and EGFR signaling in the normal rat mammary gland and in hormone-dependent rat mammary cancers. Horm Cancer. 2010;1:229–244. doi: 10.1007/s12672-010-0048-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kim JJ, et al. Progesterone action in endometrial cancer, endometriosis, uterine fibroids, and breast cancer. Endocr Rev. 2013;34:130–162. doi: 10.1210/er.2012-1043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhai Y, et al. Loss of estrogen receptor 1 enhances cervical cancer invasion. Am J Pathol. 2010;177:884–895. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.091166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yoo YA, et al. Progesterone signaling inhibits cervical carcinogenesis in mice. Am J Pathol. 2013;183:1679–1687. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.07.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fonseca-Moutinho JA, et al. Estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and bcl-2 are markers with prognostic significance in CIN III. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2004;14:911–920. doi: 10.1111/j.1048-891X.2004.14529.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES