Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 30;10(8):1045–1053. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsu153

Table 4.

Neural congruency effects computed by subtracting parameter estimates on congruent trials from activation on incongruent trials (arbitrary units)

Regions Stay gender Switch gender Stay emotion Switch emotion Gender task-switch comparison Emotion expression task-switch comparison
R VLPFC 0.095 −0.492 −0.253 0.368 3.382* 3.447*
MCC 0.199 −0.246 −0.177 0.468 2.221* 3.468*
L VLPFC 0.154 −0.461 −0.241 0.100 2.325* 1.938
MOC 0.184 −0.400 −0.310 0.355 2.013 2.540*
R DLPFC 0.021 −0.328 −0.095 0.711 1.239 2.484*
P. Caud. 0.169 −0.074 −0.141 0.208 2.138* 2.459*
R OC 0.251 −0.337 −0.395 0.181 2.352* 2.832*
A. Caud. 0.135 −0.270 −0.207 0.198 2.034 2.520*

These correspond to the clusters in Table 3 and the graphs displayed in Figure 5. t values (df = 19) are included for the comparisons between Stay and Switch Congruency Effects within the Gender and Emotion Expression Tasks. Asterisks denote comparisons for which P < 0.05