Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 5;10(8):e0128329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128329

Table 9. Concepts and metaphors in studies of medication safety.

Social Technical
Characteristics of patients Problematic presentation; Cognitive and educational deficiencies Risks vs. Benefits of taking medications; Mismatch between patient behaviour and system requirements
Relationships between primary health care staff Deference towards GPs; Clinical autonomy creates communication problems; A need for “free” and open two-way communication without fear of blame Pharmacists’ access to GPs and medical records; Poorly performing GPs; The degree of face-to-face contact between different health workers
Communication between patients and staff “To create a feeling of safety” [63]; Communication between doctors and patients mediated by receptionists and telephones (potential for further errors) Pressures of time; Prescribing reduces face-to-face contact between patients and staff
Knowledge Insufficient time for medication counselling with patients; Inflexibility and irrelevance of guidelines; New drugs Lack of transparency and access to information in EHRs; Drug and therapeutics training “picked up on the job” [59]
Responsibility Whosoever has the responsibility gets the blame; Responsibility and control resides with the patients’ own doctor or prescriber, but it needs to be shared out with other doctors and patients; A tension between getting patients involved and eroding professional trust (and power?) Power versus competence; Systems versus ad hoc approaches
Workflow Getting around unhelpful guidelines and systems within pressures of workload Time and resource constraints mean adhering to guidelines or systems can introduce ‘new’ errors; Working around and dealing with unhelpful computer systems