Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 15;3(2):e66. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4530

Table 2.

Effect of the TXT2BFiT program on measured weight and BMI outcomes for all randomized participants in the study by allocation (intention-to-treat analysis) (n=250).

Measured variable Intervention group (n=125)a,
mean (SD)
Control group (n=125),
mean (SD)
Model βb
(95% CI)
P

Baseline 12 weeks Baseline 12 weeks

Body weight, measured in kg 78.3 (11.4) 76.4 (11.1) 79.3 (12.7) 79.5 (12.4) 2.2 (0.8-3.6) .005
BMIc, measured in kg/m2 27.3 (2.4) 26.4 (1.9) 27.1 (2.7) 26.8 (2.2) 0.5 (0.1-1.0) .02

aAll participants had measured variables including 2 participants who did not complete baseline self-report surveys.

bModel coefficients and P values were obtained from analysis of covariance models adjusting for baseline values, general practitioner clinic, and gender. Missing baseline and follow-up values were imputed to create five datasets and results were pooled using Rubin’s rules.

cBody mass index (BMI).