Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 5;2015:0413.
Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Frequency of bowel movement

Systematic review
People (>90% aged >16 years) with idiopathic chronic constipation (modified Rome II criteria and negative investigations)
3 RCTs in this analysis
Failure to respond to therapy (response defined as increase to 3 or more spontaneous bowel movements [SBMs] per week from baseline [1 RCT]; 3 or more SBMs per week [1 RCT]; or 4 or more SBMs per week [1 RCT])
151/335 (45%) with lubiprostone
184/275 (67%) with placebo

RR 0.67
95% CI 0.56 to 0.80
P <0.0001
NNT 4
95% CI 3 to 7
See Further information on studies
Small effect size lubiprostone

RCT
4-armed trial
People, average age about 40 years, with idiopathic chronic constipation Changes in the weekly average number of SBMs from baseline at 1 week
with highest-dose lubiprostone
with placebo
Absolute results reported graphically

P <0.01
Results were also significant at 2 weeks (P <0.01)
Post hoc analysis
Effect size not calculated lubiprostone

RCT
4-armed trial
People, average age about 40 years, with idiopathic chronic constipation Changes in the weekly average number of SBMs from baseline at 1 week
with middle-dose lubiprostone
with placebo
Absolute results reported graphically

P <0.01
Results were also significant at 2 weeks (P <0.05)
Post hoc analysis
Effect size not calculated lubiprostone

RCT
4-armed trial
People, average age about 40 years, with idiopathic chronic constipation Changes in the weekly average number of SBMs from baseline at 1 week
with lowest-dose lubiprostone
with placebo
Absolute results reported graphically

Reported as P <0.1
Results were not significant at 2 weeks (P value not reported)
Post hoc analysis
Not significant