Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec;13(6):583–591. doi: 10.7785/tcrtexpress.2013.600258

Table III.

Patients divided by failed observations (N) for each combination of the image guidance (IG) protocol and referencing scheme and for no image guidance (NIG) scenario.

N = 0 N = 1 N = 2 N = 3 N > 3
IG protocol Referencing scheme Number of patients (%)
NIG 11 (18.3) 13 (21.7) 14 (23.3) 4 (6.7%) 18 (30.0)
R1 13 (21.7) 10 (16.7) 15 (25.0) 6 (10.0) 16 (26.7)
IG-1 R3 15 (25.0) 11 (18.3) 12 (20.0) 5 (8.3) 17 (28.3)
R5 17 (28.3) 10 (16.7) 13 (21.7) 4 (6.7) 16 (26.7)
R1 23 (38.3) 11 (18.3) 9 (15.0) 4 (6.7) 13 (21.7)
IG-2 R3 26 (43.3) 10 (16.7) 10 (16.7) 2 (3.3) 12 (20.0)
R5 25 (41.7) 12 (20.0) 9 (15.0) 2 (3.3) 12 (20.0)
R1 17 (28.3) 13 (21.7) 10 (16.7) 5 (8.3) 15 (25.0)
IG-3 R3 19 (31.7) 12 (20.0) 12 (20.0) 3 (5.0) 14 (23.3)
R5 20 (33.3) 13 (21.7) 11 (18.3) 2 (3.3) 14 (23.3)
R1 10 (16.7) 12 (20.0) 11 (18.3) 8 (13.3) 19 (31.7)
IG-4 R3 11 (18.3) 13 (21.7) 13 (21.7) 6 (10.0) 17 (28.3)
R5 12 (20.0) 14 (23.3) 11 (18.3) 6 (10.0) 17 (28.3)