Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec;13(6):505–515. doi: 10.7785/tcrtexpress.2013.600276

Table II.

Comparison of target coverage and normal tissue sparing: dose-volume metrics of 4D treatment plans after 3D optimization and after 4D optimization for each patient. The prescribed dose is 74 Gy.

Patient Optimization D95%PTV DmaxPTV DmeanPTV MLD V20GyLungs V30GyLungs DmaxEsophagus DmeanEsophagus V55GyEsophagus DmaxCord D0.1%Cord DmaxHeart DmeanHeart V40GyHeart DmeanSkin-PTV
A 3D 71.6 78.3 74.5 10.1 16.9 11.3 31.6 12.3 0 2.7 2.1 54.6 16.3 7.5 5.8
4D 72.7 80.0 74.8 10.3 17.3 11.5 32.0 12.6 0 2.7 2.2 55.8 16.7 8.3 6.0
B 3D 63.6 85.7 75.6 19.9 30.1 24.8 72.1 18.7 8.8 46.0 44.6 78.5 37.8 50.7 10.5
4D 65.3 86.5 75.8 20.8 31.2 25.8 73.3 19.4 9.5 46.7 45.2 78.7 38.2 52.1 10.5
C 3D 73.1 84.6 77.7 7.7 14.3 9.4 76.9 13.6 3.1 34.6 33.8 27.2 1.2 0 5.0
4D 71.6 81.6 75.8 7.5 14.9 9.0 76.2 13.6 2.8 35.0 33.9 24.5 1.1 0 4.8

Dmean and Dmax represent the dose received by mean and maximum volume of the PTV or OARs, respectively; MLD the mean lung dose; DA% the dose received by A% of volume of the PTV or OARs (Gy); and VBGy the fractional volume of OARs receiving at least B Gy (%).