Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 6.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Urol Rep. 2014 Dec;15(12):462. doi: 10.1007/s11934-014-0462-x

Table 1.

Studies on the association between diabetes, associated hyperglycemia and insulin resistance, and BPH/LUTS

Year Authors Country Number of samples BPH definition Diabetes definition DM and BPH findings
2014 Ferreira et al. Brazil: cross-sectional 62 LUTS (IPSS) Self-reported DM associated with LUTS, especially nocturia
2014 Qu et al. China: cross-sectional 117 LUTS (IPSS); PSA; TRUS PV FPG (≥7 mmol/l); 2-h oral glucose tolerance test (≥110 mg/dl) Men with diabetes had increased prostate volume (41.18 versus 51.52 cm3, p=0.005) and increased PSA (1.94 versus 3.23, p=0.013)
2014 Russo et al. Italy: cross-sectional 544 LUTS (IPSS); PSA; TRUS PV HOM-IR, FPG>100 mg/dl Insulin resistance was an independent predictor of severe LUTS (IPSS≥20) (OR=2.0, 95 % CI 1.20–3.34)
2014 Zhang et al. China: cross-sectional 401 LUTS (IPSS); PSA; TRUS PV FPG (≥110 mg/dl) PV was correlated with FINS (r=0.421, p=0.001), but not fasting glucose (r=0.091, p=0.364) or HbA1c levels (r=0.153, p=0.127)
2013 Gacci et al. Italy: cross-sectional 271 Prostatectomy for moderate/ severe LUTS due to BPH AHA/NHLBI criteria or previous diagnosis of type 2 diabetes Inflammatory score (p=0.049), lower uroflowmetric parameters (p=0.008) IPSS (p=0.064)
2013 Van Den Eeden et al. USA: retrospective cohort 63245 LUTS (IPSS) DM defined as: fasting glucose (>100 mg/dl) or DM diagnosis LUTS OR=1.32(95 % CI, 1.26–1.38)
No association between DM and new-onset LUTS
2013 Wallner et al. USA: cohort 369 AUA-SI, maximal urinary flow rate, prostate volume, serum PSA Self-report, HOMA-IR, FPG, FINS No significant trends of metabolic disturbances as measured by serum glucose, insulin, or insulin resistance
2012 Sarma et al. USA: cross-sectional 2226 AUA-SI, maximal urinary flow rate, prostate volume, serum PSA Self-reported LUTS OR=1.37 (95 % CI 1.00–1.87), LUTS in patients with no DM medication 2.05 (95 % CI 1.11–3.80)
2011 Yim et al. Korea: cross-sectional 968 Transrectal ultrasound of prostate P; prostate-specific antigen FPG; WC Increased PV is associated FPG and WC: (18.9 versus 16.9 cm3, p=0.001; 19.5 versus 17.5 cm3, p=0.001)
2009 Wang et al. Taiwan: case-control convenience sample from diabetes clinic and health fair
Age <45
DM (n=226); Non-DM (n=183) IPSS; FR/PVR DM defined by American Diabetes Association criteria Patients with diabetes were more. Men with diabetes compared to the control group had worse overall IPSS (6.1 versus 4.1, p<0.001), worse storage (2.7 versus 2.0, p=0.02), and voiding subdomains (3.5 versus 2.1, p<0.001)

PSA prostate-specific antigen, PV prostate volume, FPG fasting plasma glucose, WC waist circumference, LUTS lower urinary tract symptoms, IPSS International Prostate Symptom Score, FINS fasting insulin, HbA1c glycosylated hemoglobin, FR/PVR flow rate/post-void residual, HOMA-IR homeostasis model of assessment-insulin resistance