Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 6.
Published in final edited form as: Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2015 Mar 23;40(8):788–796. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2014-0568

Table 5.

Two-way ANOVA on the effects of Age and EAA (and interaction term) on hTnnt3 splice form relative abundance comparing data obtained from study 1 and 2, post-exercise (see text). Statistically significant (after Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate correction) p values are highlighted in bold typeface. False discovery rate correction was not performed on principal components (PC1-4).

hTnnt3
splice
form
Age EAA Age*EAA
F statistic P value F statistic P value F statistic P value
α1 2.4253 0.1378 1.7105 0.2083 0.3003 0.5908
α2 1.7730 0.2006 0.5312 0.4760 1.3029 0.2695
α3 6.0321 0.0251 1.2538 0.2784 0.9736 0.3376
α4 5.3080 0.0341 14.5057 0.0014 0.4427 0.5147
α5 1.8653 0.1898 0.0000 0.9970 0.2077 0.6543
α6 0.7308 0.4045 2.7261 0.1171 0.9190 0.3512
α7 16.6591 0.0008 10.8661 0.0043 0.1301 0.7228
α8 1.6938 0.2105 3.6962 0.0715 0.9883 0.3341
α9 0.6447 0.4331 0.5622 0.4636 0.0295 0.8656
β1 11.6368 0.0033 3.3515 0.0847 2.3247 0.1457
β2 1.5897 0.2244 0.6225 0.4410 1.7386 0.2048
β3 6.2125 0.0233 3.0363 0.0995 1.5912 0.2242
PC1 2.7610 0.1149 0.1103 0.7438 1.9706 0.1784
PC2 9.5282 0.0067 13.7314 0.0018 0.0029 0.9578
PC3 4.0787 0.0595 1.8529 0.1912 0.0302 0.8642
PC4 1.1624 0.2960 0.1430 0.7100 0.2313 0.6367

Results were obtained using the collapsed means across the timepoints, but excluding the “Rest” data.