Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 10;5(8):1695–1701. doi: 10.1534/g3.115.019554

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Inferred karyotype and heterozygosity of DGRP lines for common inversions. DGRP line numbers indicated for anomalous cases. Predictions based on our principal components analyses are shown by symbol shapes: squares, inversion homozygotes; circles, Standard homozygotes; and triangles, inversion heterozygotes. Colors reference the states inferred in Huang et al. (2014) and CD-L: red, inversion homozygote in both; blue, standard homozygote in both; lavender, heterozygous in Huang et al. (2014) (CD-L in most cases did not scores heterozygotes); yellow, Standard homozygote in Huang et al. (2014) but inversion homozygote in CD-L (excluding RAL48, which was not scored by CD-L); cyan, inversion homozygote in Huang et al. (2014) but Standard homozygote in CD-L; green, predicted heterozygote for a rare inversion [line 373 for 3R was predicted as In(3R)Mo homozygote by CD-L]; white, Standard homozygote in Huang et al. (2014) but In(2R)NS homozygote by CD-L. Note that separate PC analyses were performed separately for each inverted region, so the scale of PC1 scores for each chromosome arm is different.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure