Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 7;282(1812):20150934. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0934

Table 2.

Conditioning: results of the three-way ANOVA on the change in shoaling index, testing for the effects of risk (low versus high), the conditioning cue (PO versus NO), and the species used for the cue (pike versus sturgeon). Significant differences are in italics.

F d.f. p-value
risk 0.04 1, 187 0.84
cue 4.66 1, 187 0.034
species 1.89 1, 187 0.17
risk × cue 16.77 1, 187 <0.001