Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 7;282(1812):20150943. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0943

Table 2.

Results of Bayes factor analyses carried out to compare phylogenetic hypotheses regarding the Dmanisi fossils. Numbers refer to electronic supplementary material, figure S3.

hypothesis marginal log-likelihood Bayes factor interpretation
2a. Rightmire et al. [25] −2258.95 4.00 evidence not strong enough to reject model
2b. Gabunia et al. [26] −2259.21 4.52 evidence not strong enough to reject model
2c. Gabounia et al. [27] −2260.09 6.28 strong evidence to reject model
2d. Lordkipanidze et al. [17] −2266.44 18.98 strong evidence to reject model
2e. Martinón-Torres et al. [29] −2256.95 best model
2f. Bermúdez de Castro et al. [30] −2261.47 9.04 strong evidence to reject model