Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 8;12:68. doi: 10.1186/s12978-015-0058-z

Table 2.

Comparison of availability of modern contraceptives in public and private health facilities: Univariable and Multiple Logistic Regression

Contraceptive type available OR1 [95 % CI] OR2 [95 % CI]
Combined oral contraceptive
 Private 1
 Public 0.58 [0.10–3.50] 0.63 [0.33–11.84]
Progestin only
 Private 1
 Public 7.60* [1.43–40.39] 0.30 [0.02–4.71]
Male condoms
 Private 1
 Public 0.80 [0.14–4.62] 0.30 [0.01–7.46]
Implants
 Private 1
 Public 5.85* [1.01–34.10] 3.24 [0.11–93.07]
Copper IUD
 Private 1
 Public 5.85* [1.01–34.10] 3.24 [0.11–93.07]

For the multiple regression the following categories of contraceptives: the combined oral contraceptives, the male condoms, the implants and the copper IUD contained three predictor variables namely, the type of facility (eg LCS, pharmacy) under each health institution, the last time the facility was stocked with contraceptives and the average number of clients. The progestin only contraceptive contained two predictor variables namely the type of facility (eg LCS, pharmacy) under each health institution and the average number of clients per day

OR 1 Odds Ratio for univariable logistic regression, OR 2 Odds Ratio for multiple logistic regression analysis, CI 1 &CI 2 95 % Confidence Interval for OR1 & OR2

*P value significant at 0.05