Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 7;19(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1012-8

Table 2.

Acute illness severity and treatments performed of patients with NLVEF compared with HDLVEF

NLVEF HDLVEF p value
Acute illness indicators
 SOFA score 6 [3–9] 7 [4–10] <0.01
 Sepsis 1025 (40 %) 150 (46 %) 0.04
 Heart rate maximum, beats/min 113 [98–130] 120 [103–139] <0.01
 MAP minimum, mmHg 56 [48–64] 52 [43–62] <0.01
 Temperature maximum (°C) 37.8 [37.3–38.5] 37.9 [37.4–38.5] 0.6
Selected laboratory results
 WBC max k/μL 13.3 [9.4–18.3] 14.6 [10.2–20.5] <0.01
 Lactate max mMol/L 2.1 [1.4–3.7] 2.6 [1.6–4.8] <0.01
 Creat max mg/dL 1.1 [0.8–1.8] 1.2 [0.8–2.0] 0.04
Treatments received
 Renal replacement 288 (11 %) 50 (15 %) 0.04
 Vasopressor use 741 (29 %) 125 (39 %) <0.01
 Mechanical ventilation 1298 (51 %) 198 (61 %) <0.01
 IV fluids, L (first 24 h) 2.2 [0.6–5.2] 2.5 [0.7–5.7] 0.2

HDLVEF hyperdynamic left ventricular ejection fraction on echocardiogram, IV intravenous, MAP mean arterial pressure, NLVEF normal left ventricular ejection fraction on echocardiogram, SOFA Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, WBC white blood cell count

Acute illness severity and treatments performed for patients with NLVEF compared with HDLVEF are displayed as either n (%) or median [IQR]. p Values <0.01 are listed in bold