Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 1;11(4):355–363. doi: 10.1089/chi.2014.0120

Table 3.

Unadjusted Analysis for Waist Circumference, Weight, and zBMI

Part I: before imputation Standard care N (%) Intervention N (%) Total N (%) p valuea
Waist circumference Negative or zero 16 (31.4) 28 (56) 44 (43.6) 0.02
  Positive 35 (68.6) 22 (44) 57 (56.4)  
  Total 51 50 101  
Weight Negative or zero 6 (10.3) 17 (31.5) 23 (20.5) 0.009
  Positive 52 (89.7) 37 (68.5) 89 (79.5)  
  Total 58 54 112  
zBMI Negative or zero 34 (58.6) 36 (67.9) 70 (63.1) 0.33
  Positive 24 (41.4) 17 (32.1) 41 (36.9)  
  Total 58 53 111  
Part II: imputation method Ib Standard care N (%) Intervention N (%) Total N (%) p valuea
Waist circumference Negative or zero 16 (26.2) 28 (49.1) 44 (37.3) 0.01
  Positive 45 (73.8) 29 (50.9) 74 (62.7)  
  Total 61 57 118  
Weight Negative or zero 6 (9.8) 17 (29.8) 23 (19.5) 0.01
  Positive 55 (90.2) 40 (70.2) 95 (80.5)  
  Total 61 57 118  
zBMI Negative or zero 34 (55.7) 36 (63.2) 70 (59.3) 0.46
  Positive 27 (44.3) 21 (36.8) 48 (40.7)  
  Total 61 57 118  
Part III: imputation method IIc Standard care N (%) Intervention N (%) Total N (%) p valuea
Waist circumference Negative or zero 26 (42.6) 35 (61.4) 61 (51.7) 0.045
  Positive 35 (57.4) 22 (38.6) 57 (48.3)  
  Total 61 57 118  
Weight Negative or zero 9 (14.8) 20 (35.1) 29 (24.6) 0.018
  Positive 52 (85.2) 37 (64.9) 89 (75.4)  
  Total 61 57 118  
zBMI Negative or zero 37 (60.7) 40 (70.2) 77 (65.3) 0.335
  Positive 24 (39.3) 17 (29.8) 41 (34.7)  
  Total 61 57 118  
a

Fisher's exact test.

b

All children with missing data experienced weight gain.

c

All children with missing data did not experience weight gain.