Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 7;10(8):e0127815. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127815

Table 2. Details of the calculations for the proportion of global symptom relief.

Antidepressants Study(First Author and year of publication) The definition criteria for the calculation of proportion of global symptom relief Treatment Group Treatment Group Control Group Control Group
Improved Total Improved Total
TCAs Myren J 1982 A feeling of well-being. After therapy, IBS patients were divided into three groups (ie. improved, unchanged and worse) and the result was calculated as the proportion of the improved group. 25 30 21 31
Drossman 2003 Global well-being (“how would you rate your general well-being”) scored on a Likert scale from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent) and was calculated according to the proportion of “good, very good and excellent”. 55 115 21 57
Vahedi 2008 Calculated the proportion of the absence of all symptoms. 17 27 7 27
Talley NJ 2008 Calculated the proportion of “adequate relief over 50% in a week”. 10 18 9 16
Abdul-Baki H 2009 Assessed by asking the following question: “Have your symptoms improved satisfactorily since starting the drug study?” The result was calculated as per to the proportion of the improved group. 25 59 12 48
SSRIs Kuiken SD 2003 Assessed by asking the following question: “Please consider how you felt during the past 2 weeks in regard to your irritable bowel syndrome. Compared to the way you felt before entering the study, how would you rate your relief of symptoms during the past 2 weeks?”. Possible answers were relieved, unchanged, or worse. The result was calculated as per to the proportion of the relieved group 10 19 9 21
Creed F 2003 After therapy, IBS patients were divided into three groups (ie. improved, same and worse) and the result was calculated as per to the proportion of the improved group 49 86 30 86
Talley NJ 2008 Calculated the proportion of “adequate relief over 50% in a week” 8 17 9 16
Masand PS 2009 The responders were defined as subjects with clinical global impression–improvement (CGI–I) scores of 1 or 2 at the end of treatment The result was calculated as per to the proportion of the responders. 25 36 6 36
Ladabaum U 2010 Overall response was defined as achieving self-reported weekly “adequate relief” for at least three of the last 6 weeks. The result was calculated as per to the proportion of the responders. 12 27 15 27