Table 1.
Critical appraisal of included studies and description of biomarkers
Study | SP | SA | PF | O | C | AR | B | HIF-1a | HIF-2a | CA-IX | GLUT-1 | OPN |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aebersold et al. 20 | L | H | L | L | M | L | 1 | • | ||||
Avirović et al. 35 | M | L | M | L | M | L | 3 | • | ||||
Brockton et al. 48 | L | H | M | L | M | L | 2 | • | ||||
Brockton et al. 33 | M | H | M | L | M | L | 3 | • | • | |||
Cabanillas et al. 53 | H | H | L | L | M | L | 3 | • | ||||
Chien et al. 36 | H | H | L | L | L | M | 3 | • | ||||
Chien et al. 37 | M | L | L | L | M | L | 2 | • | ||||
Choi et al. 57 | M | H | L | L | M | M | 3 | • | ||||
Choi et al. 38 | M | L | L | L | M | M | 3 | • | ||||
Dos Santos et al. 39 | M | L | L | L | L | M | 2 | • | ||||
Douglas et al. 22 | L | H | L | L | L | L | 0 | • | • | |||
Dunkel et al. 40 | L | H | L | L | M | M | 2 | • | ||||
Eckert et al. 41 | H | L | L | L | M | L | 3 | • | • | |||
Eckert et al. 42 | H | L | L | L | L | L | 2 | • | • | |||
Eriksen et al. 61 | L | L | L | L | L | L | 0 | • | ||||
Fillies et al. 49 | H | H | M | L | L | L | 3 | • | ||||
Grimm et al. 44 | H | L | L | L | M | L | 3 | • | ||||
Hong et al. 56 | L | L | L | L | L | L | 0 | • | ||||
Hui et al. 31 | L | H | L | L | L | L | 0 | • | • | |||
Jonathan et a. 30 | M | L | L | L | L | L | 1 | • | • | |||
Kim et al. 51 | H | L | M | L | L | L | 3 | • | ||||
Kitagawa et al. 32 | H | L | M | L | L | L | 3 | • | ||||
Kwon et al. 23 | H | L | L | L | M | L | 3 | • | • | • | ||
Le et al. 58 | H | L | M | L | L | L | 3 | • | • | |||
Liang et al. 45 | L | H | L | L | H | L | 2 | • | • | |||
Nordsmark et al. 29 | M | L | L | L | M | M | 3 | • | • | • | ||
Pérez-Sayáns et al. 55 | M | L | L | L | M | M | 3 | • | ||||
Rademakers et al. 24 | M | L | M | L | L | L | 2 | • | ||||
Rahimi et al. 60 | L | H | L | L | L | L | 0 | • | • | |||
Roh et al. 52 | L | L | M | L | M | L | 2 | • | • | • | ||
Schrijvers et al. 25 | L | L | M | L | L | L | 1 | • | • | • | ||
Silva et al. 21 | M | H | L | L | M | L | 2 | • | ||||
Van den Broek (2009) | L | H | M | L | L | L | 1 | • | • | |||
Wachters et al. 26 | L | H | L | L | L | L | 0 | • | • | • | ||
Wan et al. 59 | M | H | M | L | L | L | 2 | • | ||||
Wildeman et al. 27 | M | L | L | L | M | L | 2 | • | • | |||
Winter et al. 54 | M | L | L | L | M | L | 2 | • | • | • | ||
Xueguan et al. 28 | L | L | L | L | M | M | 2 | • | ||||
Zheng et al. 46 | M | H | L | L | M | M | 3 | • | ||||
Zhu et al. 47 | L | H | M | L | L | L | 1 | • | • | |||
Totals | 27 | 3 | 21 | 7 | 6 |
Low, 0; Moderate, 1; High, 2 points. SA was not included. Studies with a bias score >3 were excluded. Appraisal of these studies is described in supplementary table S2. SP, study participation; SA, study attrition; PF, prognostic factor; O, Outcome; C, Confounding; AR, statistical analysis and reporting. B, Bias score according to QUIPS; HIF-1, hypoxia-inducible factor 1. The EMHs that were described in each study are shown with a filled dot (example of filled dot).