Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Sci. 2015 Jul 1;26(8):1272–1284. doi: 10.1177/0956797615586796

Table 3.

Descriptive statistics and correlations between maternal and infant vocal contingencies

Contingencies
Maternal vocal
responsiveness
Infant vocal
responsiveness

n M SD M SD r
Argentina 97 1.52ab .74 1.18 .51 .35***
Belgium 99 1.22acd .43 1.07 .51 .46***
Brazil 58 1.33abcd .53 1.13 .49 .37**a
Cameroon 29 1.46abcd .91 1.26 .69 .55***
France 49 1.24abcd .39 1.12 .43 .74***
Israel 30 1.38abcd .46 1.06 .38 .62***
Italy 92 1.47ab .56 1.19 .39 .55***
Japan 49 1.45abd .61 1.19 .40 .42**
Kenya 19 1.24c .86 1.42 .61 .21
South Korea 51 1.12cd .31 1.23 .45 .27*
United States 100 1.51b .66 1.14 .44 .40***

Total 673 1.38 .59 1.16 .47 .42***

Note. Descriptive statistics are based on untransformed variables, but statistical tests were performed on transformed variables. Community means that do not share subscripts withincolumns differed significantly (p < .025) in Bonferroni post-hoc tests. There was no significant effect of community for IVR. Correlations are one-tailed.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.

a

n = 57, excluding one influential outlier.