Table 2.
ID | Practice size | PCR % | Participants at practice meeting | Number of patients identified by the search | % of patients identified by the search | Number of search patients assessed as surprise positive | Percentage of search patients assessed as surprise positive |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 10329 | 0.83 % | 10 (6 GP, 2 PM, 1PN, 1 IT) | 76 | 0.74 % | 51 | 67 % |
2 | 10775 | 0.05 % | 7 (6 GP, 1 PM) | 121 | 1.13 % | 43 | 36 % |
3 | 10924 | 0.14 % | 12 (5 GP, 2 PM, 3 PN, 1 IT, 1 medical student) | 55 | 0.50 % | 37 | 67 % |
4 | 2960 | 0.20 % | 4 (3 GP, 1 PM) | 50 | 1.69 % | 18 | 36 % |
5 | 13961 | 0.24 % | 7 (7 GP) | 90 | 0.64 % | 38 | 42 % |
6 | 4491 | 0.02 % | 5 (4 GP, 1 PM) | 39 | 0.87 % | 32 | 82 % |
7 | 4471 | 0.13 % | 3 (3 GP) | 55 | 1.23 % | 46 | 83 % |
8 | 12442 | 0.16 % | 10 (10 GP) | 117 | 0.94 % | 25 | 21 % |
9 | 1890 | 0.26 % | 2 (1GP, 1 PM) | 23 | 1.22 % | 6 | 26 % |
10 | 10986 | 0.37 % | 10 (8 GP, 1 PM, 1 IT) | 121 | 1.10 % | 43 | 36 % |
PCR% initial percentage of patients on the palliative care register; participants (GP general practitioner, PM practice manager, IT information technology expert, PN practice nurse)