Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Biosoc Sci. 2010 Jan 18;42(3):307–323. doi: 10.1017/S0021932009990575

Table 3.

Interaction Coefficients from Conditional and Multinomial Logit Models Showing the Impact of Structural measures of Power on the Relationship Between Female and Male Method Preference Ratings and the Couple’s Method Choice, by Source of Power and Couple’s Marital/Relationship Status.

Power Source and
Method Type
Married and Cohabiting Dating


Female Male Female Male
Income (F / M)
All Method Interactions ** **
    Pill 0.0001 −0.0000 −0.0001 0.0001
    Condom 0.0005** −0.0005** −0.0004* 0.0004
    Pill in Dual Use 0.0002 0.0001 −0.0024* 0.0025**
    Condom in Dual Use 0.0008** −0.0009** 0.0013 −0.0000
    No method 0.0002 0.0002 −0.0000 −0.0001
Education (F - M)
  All Method Interactions * ns
    Pill 0.001 0.002 0.002 −0.002
    Condom −0.001 0.001 −0.003 0.001
    Pill in Dual Use −0.003 0.002 −0.003 −0.008
    Condom in Dual Use 0.005* −0.005** 0.009* −0.001
    No method −0.002 −0.003** −0.002 0.000

ns Not statistically significant as a set

*

Significant at p ≤ .10

**

Significant at p ≤ .05