Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Biosoc Sci. 2010 Jan 18;42(3):307–323. doi: 10.1017/S0021932009990575

Table 4.

Interaction Coefficients from Conditional and Multinomial Logit Models Showing the Impact of Relationship-Based Measures of Power and Gender Role Ideology on the Relationship between Female and Male Method Preference Ratings and the Couple’s Method Choice, by Source of Power and Couple’s Marital/Relationship Status.

Power Source and
Method Type
Married and Cohabiting Dating
Female Male Female Male
Relationship
Alternatives (F - M)
   All Method Interactions ns *
    Pill 0.006 0.006 0.003 −0.003
    Condom −0.008 0.003 0.011** −0.012**
    Pill in Dual Use 0.001 0.002 0.022* −0.008
    Condom in Dual Use 0.009 −0.013* −0.019 −0.005
    No method −0.003 −0.003 0.001 −0.004
Female Has Lower Relationship
Commitment
  All Method Interactions ns *
    Pill −0.002 0.000 0.005 −0.008*
    Condom −0.002 −0.000 0.006* −0.008*
    Pill in Dual Use 0.005 0.008 0.013 −0.018**
    Condom in Dual Use −0.013** −0.005 −0.004 0.005
    No method −0.002 −0.003 0.006 −0.002
Gender Role Ideology
  All Method Interactions ns **
    Pill −0.000 0.000 −0.001 −0.001
    Condom −0.000 0.000 −0.001 0.001
    Pill in Dual Use −0.000 0.001 −0.008** 0.004**
    Condom in Dual Use 0.001 −0.001 0.006** 0.001
    No method −0.002** −0.001 0.000 −0.001

ns Not statistically significant as a set

*

Significant at p ≤ .10

**

Significant at p ≤ .05.