Table 4.
Interaction Coefficients from Conditional and Multinomial Logit Models Showing the Impact of Relationship-Based Measures of Power and Gender Role Ideology on the Relationship between Female and Male Method Preference Ratings and the Couple’s Method Choice, by Source of Power and Couple’s Marital/Relationship Status.
Power Source and Method Type |
Married and Cohabiting | Dating | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Female | Male | Female | Male | |
Relationship | ||||
Alternatives (F - M) | ||||
All Method Interactions | ns | * | ||
Pill | 0.006 | 0.006 | 0.003 | −0.003 |
Condom | −0.008 | 0.003 | 0.011** | −0.012** |
Pill in Dual Use | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.022* | −0.008 |
Condom in Dual Use | 0.009 | −0.013* | −0.019 | −0.005 |
No method | −0.003 | −0.003 | 0.001 | −0.004 |
Female Has Lower Relationship | ||||
Commitment | ||||
All Method Interactions | ns | * | ||
Pill | −0.002 | 0.000 | 0.005 | −0.008* |
Condom | −0.002 | −0.000 | 0.006* | −0.008* |
Pill in Dual Use | 0.005 | 0.008 | 0.013 | −0.018** |
Condom in Dual Use | −0.013** | −0.005 | −0.004 | 0.005 |
No method | −0.002 | −0.003 | 0.006 | −0.002 |
Gender Role Ideology | ||||
All Method Interactions | ns | ** | ||
Pill | −0.000 | 0.000 | −0.001 | −0.001 |
Condom | −0.000 | 0.000 | −0.001 | 0.001 |
Pill in Dual Use | −0.000 | 0.001 | −0.008** | 0.004** |
Condom in Dual Use | 0.001 | −0.001 | 0.006** | 0.001 |
No method | −0.002** | −0.001 | 0.000 | −0.001 |
ns Not statistically significant as a set
Significant at p ≤ .10
Significant at p ≤ .05.