Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep;105(9):1901–1910. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302687

TABLE 4—

Correlates of Viral Suppression on Entry Among Men: Connecticut Department of Corrections, 2005–2012

Covariate Model 1, AOR (95% CI) Model 2, AOR (95% CI) Model 3, AOR (95% CI) Model 4, AOR (95% CI)
Age (continuous) 1.06* (1.04, 1.09) 1.06* (1.04, 1.09) 1.06* (1.03, 1.08) 1.05* (1.02, 1.07)
Race/ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic White (Ref) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Non-Hispanic Black 0.31* (0.18, 0.52) 0.30* (0.18, 0.51) 0.32* (0.19, 0.53) 0.35* (0.21, 0.58)
 Hispanic 0.35* (0.20, 0.61) 0.35* (0.20, 0.60) 0.35* (0.21, 0.61) 0.37* (0.22, 0.62)
Education
 ≤ high school (Ref) 1.00 1.00 1.00 . . .
 > high school 0.84 (0.57, 1.23) 0.83 (0.37, 1.03) 0.83 (0.57, 1.21) . . .
CJ risk score
 Lowest range (Ref) 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Middle range . . . 0.82 (0.48, 1.41) 0.75 (0.44, 1.27) 0.81 (0.47, 1.39)
 Highest range . . . 0.62 (0.37, 1.03) 0.55* (0.33, 0.92) 0.49* (0.29, 0.82)
Entry ART regimen
 PI based . . . . . . 0.35 (0.11, 1.13)
 nNRTI based . . . . . . 0.47 (0.14, 1.57)
FDC 0.59 (0.34, 1.00) 0.63 (0.38, 1.03)
 NRTI only . . . . . . 0.34 (0.10, 1.18)
 INSTI . . . . . . 1.27 (0.30, 5.43) 2.11 (0.87, 5.14)
Comorbidity score . . . . . . 1.11* (1.00, 1.24) 1.13* (1.01, 1.26)
Incarceration period by intake year
 2005–2007 (Ref) . . . . . . . . . 1.00
 2008–2010 . . . . . . . . . 2.13* (1.52, 2.97)
 2011–2012 . . . . . . . . . 2.83* (1.74, 4.58)
Medical insurance on entry
 Yes (Ref) . . . . . . . . . 1.00
 No . . . . . . . . . 0.56 (0.31, 1.03)
AIC/BIC 1815.79/1844.06 1815.77/1853.46 1806.90/1872.86 1788.45/1835.57

Note. AOR = adjusted odds ratio; AIC = Akaike information criterion; ART = antiretroviral therapy; BIC = Bayesian information criterion; CI = confidence interval; CJ = criminal justice; DOT = directly observed therapy; FDC = fixed-dose combination; INSTI = integrase strand transfer inhibitor; nNRTI = nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; NRTI = nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; PI = protease inhibitor; SAT = self-administered therapy. Model 1 includes demographic characteristics only (age, race/ethnicity, education); model 2 includes demographics and CJ risk; model 3 includes demographics, CJ risk, and HIV and other comorbidity severity; model 4 includes all covariates for which P < .1 on bivariate association, followed by stepwise selection. The sample size was n = 824 individuals and n = 1532 incarceration periods.

*P < .05.