Table 3. Diffusion Tensor Imaging comparison between groups.
| Mean of Total Densitya | p-valueb | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) Control | (2) cSLE-noNCD | (3) cSLE-NCD | 1 vs. 2 | 1 vs. 3 | 2 vs. 3 |
| 1305 (19) | 1320 (24) | 1189 (29) | 0.873 | 0.002 | 0.001 |
|
| |||||
| Mean of Fiber Connectivityc | p-valued | ||||
|
| |||||
| (1) Control | (2) cSLE-noNCD | (3) cSLE-NCD | 1 vs. 2 | 1 vs. 3 | 2 vs. 3 |
| 238 (3.6%) | 236 (3.6%) | 217 (3.3%) | 0.817 | 0.004 | 0.013 |
a
Number of fiber tracts passing through a region
b
p-values are from fixed effect models, adjusted for multiple comparisons using Tukey's method
c
Average frequency of meaningful connections (> 20 fiber tracts between regions), there is a total of 6670 possible links among 116 nodes.
d
p-values are binomial models, adjusted for multiple comparisons using Tukey's method