Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 17;24(9):2273–2278. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-0944-4

Table 2.

Model fit for the CFA and ESEM models of the CFS

Model χ 2 df CFI TLI RMSEA (90 % CI) SRMR BIC
CFA
 two-factor 823.2** 43 .863 .824 120 (.113–.127) .068 30,331.9
 three-factor 569.8** 41 .907 .875 101 (.094–.109) .061 30,034.3
 Revised three-factor 482.5** 40 .922 .893 094 (.086–.101) .059 29,938.3
ESEM
 two-factor 491.3** 34 .919 .870 103 (.095–.112) .039 30,018.5
 three-factor 263.6** 25 .958 .908 087 (.078–.097) .024 29,761.1
 Revised three-factor 138.7** 24 .980 .954 062 (.052–.072) .018 29,656.1
 ESEM + covariates 228.5** 64 .974 .956 045 (.039–.052) .018 29,632.1

df degree of freedom, CFI comparative fit index, TLI Tucker–Lewis index, RMSEA root mean square error of approximation, SRMR standardized root mean square residual, BIC Bayesian information criterion, ** p < .01