Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2015 Jun 25;85:273–281. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2015.06.014

Table 2.

LV pressure-volume relationship at 6 days after sTAC

NTG Sham T60A-β5 Sham NTG sTAC T60A-β5 sTAC
N 6 6 6 6

HR, beats/min 505±23.6 514±22.7 554±28.3 506±35.6

Pes, mmHg 118.3±10.4 111.5±2.0 166.3±5.3* 130.4±33.3

Ves, μl 10.4±2.9 12.0±4.2 5.0±1.8* 32.9±6.7*

Ped, mmHg 4.1±2.0 3.8±2.8 14.8±2.1* 10.3±1.7*

Ved, μl 36.4±6.2 38.4±7.6 24.8±2.4* 51.2±8.3*

SV, μl 26.0±3.4 26.4±3.3 19.8±2.8* 18.3±1.6*

SW, mmHg*μl 3072±393.0 2963±693.3 3273±396.3 2415±819.0

CO, μl/min 13108±1346.6 13537±1135.4 10947±1541.7* 36.00±2.7*

EF, % 71.82±3.0 69.12±4.8 79.83±6.8* 9293±1465.8*

dP/dtmax, mmHg/s 11075±2020.2 10722±2913.3 12079±2029.7 5595±955.3*

dP/dtmin mmHg/s 9911±1287.4 9796±1834.5 10468±1025.0 4834±1487.7*

Tau, ms 8.7±1.4 9.2±1.3 10.6±1.2 16.9±1.8*

Heart Rate (HR), end-systolic pressure (Pes), end-systolic volume (Ves), end-diastolic pressure (Ped), end-diastolic volume (Ved), Stroke Volume (SV), Stroke Work (SW), Cardiac Output (CO), Ejection Fraction (EF), the maximal rate of pressure increasing (+dP/dt), the maximal rate of pressure decreasing (−dP/dt), relaxation time constant calculated by the Glantz method (Tau).

*

p<0.05 vs. NTG Sham;

:p0.05 vs. NTG TAC.