Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul;5(3):161–172. doi: 10.1177/1941874415576204

Table 1.

Wake-Up Stroke Characteristics by Study.

Authors Study Design Total Patients Wake-Up Stroke #, % Clinical Differences vs While-Awake Stroke Outcome Differences vs While-Awake Stroke Imaging
CASPR group8 Retrospective, prospectively collected data, US state registry 374 30 (8)
Michel et al9 Retrospective, prospectively collected data, hospital registry 1633 568 (33.1)
Tanimoto et al10 Retrospective, prospectively collected data, hospital registry 72 28 (38.9) WUS: tended to be African American, younger, small vessel mechanism, less severe NIHSS, worse lipid profile
Marler et al11 Retrospective, prospectively collected data, hospital registry 1167 331 (28)
Ricci et al12 Retrospective, prospectively collected data, regional registry 375 68 (18.1)
Lago et al13 Retrospective, prospectively collected data, hospital registry 1223 309 (25.2)
Bornstein et al14 Retrospective, prospectively collected data, national registry 1671 311 (18.6) WUS more severe
Chaturvedi et al15 Subanalysis of prospective RCT 1272 323 (25.4)
Serena et al16 Retrospective, prospectively collected data, national registry 1248 301 (24.1) None WUS: CT head normal in 39.4% of patients seen within 6 hours of symptom recognition (60% in stroke while awake)
Nadeau et al17 Retrospective, prospectively collected data, national registry 2585 349 (13.5) WUS had higher BP and ischemic stroke subtype WUS less likely to return home
Boode et al18 Retrospective, hospital registry 263 48 (18.3)
Jiménez-Conde et al19 Retrospective, prospectively collected data, hospital registry 813 127 (15.6) WUS had more obesity, less AF, and higher initial stroke severity WUS had worse 3-month outcome
Silva et al20 Prospective cohort study, hospital registry 676 131 (19.4) None None Similar prevalence of CTP mismatch and arterial occlusion in WUS and known onset groups
Turin et al21 Retrospective, prospectively collected data, national registry 897 87 (9.7) WUS more hypertension and increased initial severity None
Fink et al22 Retrospective, prospectively collected data, hospital registry 364 100 (27) None Similar prevalence of MRI DWI/PWI mismatch
Moradiya et al23 Subanalysis of a prospective RCT 17 398 5152 (29.6) WUS initially less severe None
Koton et al24 Retrospective, prospectively collected data, national registry 4408 820 (18.6) None None 20%-40% prevalence of penumbra
Todo et al25 Retrospective, prospectively collected data, hospital registry 158 17 (10.8) CT findings in WUS similar to patients within 3 hours of known symptom onset
Huisa et al26 Prospective cohort study, hospital registry 96 28 (29.6) None Trend toward favorable (0-1) 90 d mRS in WUS vs 4 hours from symptoms controls (73% vs 45%) Favorable CT ASPECTS (8-10) similar in WUS and known 4 h from symptoms (89.3% vs 95.6%)
Mackey et al27 Population-based registry 1854 273 (14.7) “Minor differences” in age and rNIHSS (WUS older, higher rNIHSS) None
Roveri et al28 Retrospective, prospectively collected data, hospital registry 1531 190 (12.4) None Outcome better in controls (patients treated with tPA within 3 hours of symptoms) Baseline ASPECTS similar in WUS and controls within 3 hours of symptoms and treated with tPA
Manawadu et al29 Retrospective, prospectively collected data, hospital registry 1836 193 (10.5) Outcome better in thrombolyzed WUS vs nonthrombolyzed WUS CT ASPECTS and CTP to select patients for IV tPA

Abbreviations: WUS, wake-up stroke; RCT, randomized controlled trial; CT, computed tomography; CTP, CT perfusion; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; DWI, diffusion-weighted imaging; PWI, perfusion-weighted imaging; ASPECTS, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score; rNIHSS, retrospective National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; BP, blood pressure; AF, atrial fibrillation.