Table 3.
Excessive unhealthy (≥14) days predicted by adverse childhood experiences and step-wise inclusion of mediators
| Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | (95 % CI)a | B | (95 % CI)a | B | (95 % CI)a | |
| Main Predictor | ||||||
| Adverse childhood experiences | .21b | (.05, .43) | .104 | (−.06, .34) | .03 | (−.24, .28) |
| Mediators | ||||||
| Stress | .061b | (.03, .158) | .05b | (.01, .12) | ||
| Sleep disturbances | .10b | (.06, .23) | ||||
| Confounders | ||||||
| Age | .01 | (−.027, .04) | .03 | (−.01, .08) | .03 | (−.01, .09) |
| Sex | −.19 | (−1.33, .76) | −.19 | (−1.67, .95) | .21 | (−1.37, 1.84) |
| Education | .78 | (−.36, 2.28) | 1.35b | (.05, 3.48) | 1.85b | (.40, 4.38) |
| Marital status | .78 | (−.19, 2.40) | .55 | (−.72, 2.02) | .87 | (−.47, 3.06) |
| Non-Hispanic black | −.45 | (−2.44, 1.65) | −.17 | (−1.97, 1.85) | −.65 | (−3.01, 1.41) |
| Hispanic or Latino | −.81 | (−3.08, 1.40) | −.72 | (−2.93, 1.65) | −.97 | (−3.64, 1.24) |
| US$20,001–40,000 | −.44 | (−1.88, .71) | −.02 | (−1.68, 1.34) | −.42 | (−2.76, 1.20) |
| ≥US$40,001 | −.29 | (−19.69, 1.30) | −.31 | (−19.29 1.13) | −.30 | (−20.16, 1.85) |
| Community assets | −.05 | (−.19, .08) | .07 | (−.08, .26) | .07 | (−.11, .28) |
| Neighborhood issues | −.02 | (−.23, .15) | −.12 | (−.34, .08) | −.17 | (−.49, .03) |
| Neighborhood cohesion | −.01 | (−.03, .01) | −.01 | (−.05, .02) | −.01 | (−.05, .02) |
| Constant | −.76 | (−5.04, 2.81) | −4.32b | (−16.16, −.47) | −4.7 | (−13.87, −.05) |
| Model Chi-square [df] | 22.48 [7] | 38.32 [11] | 56.26 [14] | |||
| Nagelkerke R2 | .18 | .32 | .44 | |||
| % Correct predictions | 73.2 | 80.8 | 82.1 | |||
| Goodness of fit p-value | .44 | .55 | .38 | |||
Model 1: binary logistic regression with Unhealthy Days as outcome, ACE as predictor, and controlling for age, gender, education, marital status, race/ethnicity, income, community assets, neighborhood issues, neighborhood cohesion as covariates
Model 2: Model 1, adding stress (mediator 1)
Model 3: Model 2, adding sleep disturbance (mediator 2)
N = 151 for model 1,2, and 3
aBootstrapped 95 % confidence intervals based on 1000 bootstrapped samples. All values rounded to two digits.
bIndicates that the coefficient is statistically significant at, at least, the .05 level