Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biofabrication. 2015 Jul 22;7(3):035005. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/7/3/035005

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Mechanical assessment of patterned scaffolds with four different pore shapes. (a) Typical stress-strain curves for different porosity scaffolds, (b) Failure stress, (c) Elastic modulus, (d) Toughness (e) Failure load and (f) Stiffness of rectangular/square-shaped pore scaffolds were highest, parallel channel pore scaffolds were intermediate and diamond-shaped pore scaffolds were lowest. Asterisks indicate significant differences between groups (p <0.05).