Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biofabrication. 2015 Jul 22;7(3):035005. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/7/3/035005

Table 1.

Comparative mechanical properties of collagen based scaffolds for tissue engineering application

Collagen Based Scaffold Market
Name
Compressive
Modulus
Compressive
Strength
Tensile
Strength
Elastic
Modulus
Collagen rich xenografts (decellularized collagen matrix) Porcine dermis Permacol58 38 MPa 210 MPa
CollaMend58 10MPa 30 MPa
Strattice58 15 MPa 50 MPa
XenMatrix58 12 MPa 40MPa
Pelvitex70 1.2 MPa 5 MPa
Human dermis FlexHD58 10MPa 30 MPa
AlloMax58 22 MPa 60 MPa
Bovine pericardium Veritas58 6MPa 20 MPa
PeriGuard58 16 MPa 110 MPa
Porcine SIS Surgisis58, 70 4 MPa 15 MPa
 Human abdominal fascia36 2 MPa 10 MPa
Porcine dermis57 0.2 -3.5
MPa
Animal SIS Strasis82 3 MPa
Human cadaveric dermis Alloderm17 7.2 MPa
Human cadaveric fascia lata Faslata17 10.85 MPa
Decellularized tendon section
(Sheet form) 3
0.2-0.7 MPa 0.5- 6
MPa
Pure collagen (reconstituted collagen) Electrocompacted
patterned scaffolds in this
study
1-6 MPa 5-40 MPa
Gel form (dogbone shape) 3 0.1 MPa 0.2 MPa
Electrospun Collagen55 0.3 MPa 0.4 MPa
Collagen, Collagen+ Elastin
(freeze dry) 59
25 kPa 12 kPa 80 kPa 350-200
kPa
Collagen freeze dry26 7.8 kPa 81 kPa
Collagen–glycosaminoglycan
(freeze dry) 28
5.1 kPa 30 kPa
Gel form (dog bone shape) 62 0.5-9 kPa 1.54-25
kPa
Collagen (freeze dry) 14 20 kPa
Collagen-chitosan (freeze
dry) 14
10-20 kPa