Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Nurs. 2015 Mar-Apr;38(2):E48–E56. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000152

Table 3.

Baseline (T1) and Follow-up (T2) Dependent Variables and Difference Scores by Group with Unadjusted and Adjusted Linear Regression Models

Dependent Variablea (scale range) Usual Care Group (N=45) Intervention Group (N=43) Unadjusted p-valueb Adjusted p-valued
T1 T2 T2-T1 T1 T2 T2-T1
Overall QOL (0–108) 84.6 86.5 1.9 86.4 86.7 0.3 .51 .98 ii,iii,iv,vi
Breast cancer QOL (0–40) 27.2 28.5 1.3 26.7 26.7 0.1 .33 .88 i,ii,vi,vii,viii
Unmet needs (0–30) 6.20 3.73 −2.47 6.86 5.67 −1.19 .57c .49 vi,vii
Distress (0–10) 3.11 2.62 −0.49 2.79 2.67 −0.12 .52 .46 i,iii,v,vi
Cancer worry (1–5) 2.28 2.04 −0.24 2.23 2.15 −0.08 .30 .31iii,iv,vi,vii

Abbreviations: QOL, quality of life; T1, baseline; T2, follow-up.

a

Higher scores indicate higher levels of the dependent variable

b

t-test or

c

Wilcoxon rank-sum test

d

Adjusted for core variables (baseline level of the dependent variable, age, cancer stage, and cancer center site) plus the following:

i

symptom interference T1,

ii

symptom interference T2-T1,

iii

unmet needs T1,

iv

unmet needs T2-T1,

v

insurance status,

vi

type of surgery,

vii

hormonal treatment,

viii

race