Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 10;10(8):e0134675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134675

Table 4. Correlations (point biserial) among noticing of an unexpected object in IB Cross (all participants, Near condition, Far condition) and the cognitive tests; Study 2.

ALL NEAR FAR
Notice Notice Notice Notice Notice Notice
(critical) (divAtt) (critical) (divAtt) (critical) (divAtt)
Working Memory .18 .05 .26 .03 .15 .08
[.04, .32] [-.10, .19] [.06, .44] [-.17, .23] [-.06, .35] [-.13, .29]
N = 182 N = 182 N = 95 N = 95 N = 87 N = 87
2-Back-Identity .04 .01 .01 -.01 .11 .03
[-.11, .18] [-.14, .16] [-.19, .21] [-.21, .19] [-.10, .31] [-.18, .24]
N = 182 N = 182 N = 95 N = 95 N = 87 N = 87
2-Back-Spatial .15 .05 .26 .00 .08 .10
[.00, .29] [-.10, .19] [.06, .44] [-.20, .20] [-.13, .29] [-.11, .30]
N = 181 N = 181 N = 94 N = 94 N = 87 N = 87
Aospan .20 .05 .30 .06 .14 .04
[.06, .34] [-.10, .19] [.11, .47] [-.14, .26] [-.08, .34] [-.17, .25]
N = 182 N = 182 N = 95 N = 95 N = 87 N = 87
Attention Breadth .12 .13 .09 .05 .12 .19
[-.03, .26] [-.02, .27] [-.11, .29] [-.15, .25] [-.09, .32] [-.02, .39]
N = 182 N = 182 N = 95 N = 95 N = 87 N = 87
BoA .10 .07 .03 -.06 .13 .18
[-.05, .24] [-.08, .21] [-.17, .23] [-.26, .14] [-.08, .33] [-.03, .38]
N = 182 N = 182 N = 95 N = 95 N = 87 N = 87
UFOV .10 .15 .11 .14 .08 .16
[-.05, .24] [.01, .29] [-.09, .31] [-.06, .33] [-.13, .29] [-.05, .36]
N = 182 N = 182 N = 95 N = 95 N = 87 N = 87
Flanker .13 .04 .17 .06 .08 .01
[-.02, .27] [-.11, .19] [-.03, .36] [-.14, .26] [-.13, .29] [-.20, .22]
N = 181 N = 181 N = 94 N = 94 N = 87 N = 87
Navon -.08 .10 -.09 .05 -.10 .13
[-.22, .07] [-.05, .24] [-.29, .11] [-.15, .25] [-.30, .11] [-.08, .33]
N = 182 N = 182 N = 95 N = 95 N = 87 N = 87
Navon-Switchspeed -.03 -.09 -.11 -.14 .04 -.04
[-.18, .12] [-.23, .06] [-.31, .09] [-.33, .06] [-.17, .25] [-.25, .17]
N = 182 N = 182 N = 95 N = 95 N = 87 N = 87
CFQ -.10 -.07 -.05 -.08 -.17 -.06
[-.24, .05] [-.21, .08] [-.25, .15] [-.28, .12] [-.37, .04] [-.27, .15]
N = 182 N = 182 N = 95 N = 95 N = 87 N = 87

Note. In addition to the single cognitive measures the composite working memory measure and the composite attention breadth measure are depicted. The lower and upper bounds of the 95% confidence interval are shown in square brackets. N = number of cases contributing to each correlation. Correlations that are significant (α = 0.05; two-tailed) appear in bold, although the alpha level has not been corrected for multiple tests.