Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 10;10(8):e0135445. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135445

Table 3. Results of the Greece-Cyrenaica directed graph analysis.

Species Habitat maps Total surface area (km2) ECAmin (km2) ECA(PC) (km2)
A. purpurea Total 58.65 36.10 47.81
Non-disturbed 54.33 34.32 44.55
Difference (%) 7.36 4.95 6.82
A. ralloides Total 875.94 551.40 712.64
Non-disturbed 868.02 549.51 708.07
Difference (%) 0.90 0.35 0.64
C. ferruginea Total 810.34 537.37 668.71
Non-disturbed 788.98 531.75 655.25
Difference (%) 2.64 1.04 2.01
C. niger Total 3,373.80 1,639.67 2,500.09
Non-disturbed - - -
Difference (%) - - -
E. garzetta Total 2,479.61 1,529.77 2,006.26
Non-disturbed 2,417.66 1,521.17 1,983.97
Difference (%) 2.50 0.56 1.11
H. himantopus Total 968.59 554.19 763.76
Non-disturbed 950.72 551.50 753.49
Difference (%) 1.85 0.48 1.35
T. glareola Total 853.06 550.29 701.58
Non-disturbed 839.71 547.67 694.15
Difference (%) 1.56 0.48 1.06

A comparison of total habitat (Total) and total non-disturbed habitats (Non-disturbed) maps is made by means of total habitat surface, ECAmin and Equivalent Connected Area through the Probability of Connectivity (ECA(PC)) values, with indication of differences in percentages. Since an FID distance for C. niger was less relevant, no disturbed habitat area was established.