. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2016 Jan;44(1):155–166. doi: 10.1007/s10802-015-9984-z

Table 2.

Wave 3 Victimization Risk by ADHD Diagnostic Persistence

	Comparison n = 68	Transient ADHD n = 58	Persistent ADHD n = 67		ES^b and Post Hoc
W3 IPV Status	%	%	%	p-value^a	C-T	C-P	T-P	p-value^c

Victimized	5.9	19.0	37.3	<.001	3.74^*	9.52^*	2.54^*	<.05

Note. ADHD = Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder; Victimized = physically victimized by an intimate partner; C = lifetime non-diagnosed comparison group; T = transient ADHD (includes 47 with ADHD at Wave 1 only and 11 with ADHD at Wave 3 only); P = persistent ADHD.

Significant at p < .05.

Significance: chi-squared.

Odds ratios, reflecting subgroup contrasts.

Significance: logistic regression.