Table 4.
Outcome on kidney angiomyolipoma
| Studies | Volume (cc) | Sum of longest diameter (mm) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | n | After treatment | n | Mean diff (95 % CI) | Baseline | n | After treatment | n | Mean diff (95 % CI) | |
| Cabrera Lopez 2011 | 62.6 ± 18.3 | 17 | 23.1 ± 7.0 | 16 | −39.5 (−30.15,–48.85) | |||||
| Dabora 2011 | 212 ± 146 | 36 | 145 ± 113 | 28 | −67 (−3.55,–130.5) | |||||
| Davies 2011 | 135.5 ± 135.6 | 10 | 62.8 ± 20.1 | 7 | −69.80 (15.39,–154.99) | |||||
| Overall Effect | −39.5 (−48.85, −30.15) | −69.03 (−158.05, 12.65) | ||||||||
| p = <0.00001 | p = 0.008 | |||||||||
| Heterogeneity | Not applicable | Chi2 = 0.01; I2 = 0 % | ||||||||