Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 11;16:343. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0886-8

Table 8.

Compared baseline characteristics of the CardioBBEAT, TIM-HF and INH study participants

Variable CardioBBEAT TIM-HF INH
Usual care Monitoring Usual care Monitoring Usual care Monitoring
(n = 319) (n = 302) (n = 356) (n = 354) (n = 363) (n = 352)
Demographic profile
  Age (years) 63.5 ± 11.4 62.5 ± 11.6 66.9 ± 10.5 66.9 ± 10.8 69.4 ± 11.5 67.7 ± 12.8
  Male sex (%) 88 87 82 81 71 71
  Living alone (%) 24 27 22 21 35 30
Clinical profile
  NYHA class (%)
   I 0 0 0 0 2 3
   II 65 73 51 50 62 54
   III 34 26 49 50 31 40
   IV 1 1 0 0 5 3
Risk factor profile
  BMI (kg/m2) 28 ± 5 28 ± 5 28 ± 5 28 ± 5 n.a. n.a.
  Diabetes mellitus (%) 32 38 39 40 36 36
  Hypertension (%) 84 87 66 68 77 72
Diagnostic
  Heart rate (1/min) 72 ± 14 72 ± 13 71 ± 13 71 ± 13 80 ± 18 80 ± 20
  LVEF (%) 31 ± 7 30 ± 8 27 ± 6 27 ± 6 30 ± 8 30 ± 8
Medication (%)
  ACE inhibitor/ARB 93 93 97 94 87 89
  Beta blocker 95 96 93 92 79 81
  Diuretics 80 83 94 94 86 90

ACE angiotensin converting enzyme, ARB angiotensin receptor blocker, BMI body mass index, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, n.a. not available, NYHA New York Heart Association, classification of heart failure