Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 17;6(9):883–892. doi: 10.7150/jca.11814

Table 2.

Assessing quality of all the 9 included studies

Study Randomization process Estimation
of sample size
Allocation concealment Intention to
treat analysis
Loss to
follow-up
Dropout Jadad scores
NACT+RT vs. RT
Cvitcovics et al. 7 1996 Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes 3
Chua et al. 8 1998 Yes Yes No Yes No Yes 3
Ma et al. 9 2001 No Yes No Yes Yes Yes 2
Hareyama et al. 10 2002 Yes No No Yes Yes Yes 3
CCRT vs. RT
Chan et al. 22,23 2002,2005 Yes Yes No Yes No Yes 3
Kwong et al. 24 2004 No No No Yes Yes Yes 2
Zhang et al. 25,26 2005,2013 No Yes No No No Yes 2
NACT+CCRT vs. CCRT
Hui et al. 12 2009 Yes Yes No Yes No Yes 3
Fountzilas et al. 132012 Yes Yes No Yes No Yes 3

NACT: neoadjuvant chemotherapy; CCRT: concurrent chemoradiotherapy; RT: radiotherapy.