Table 2.
RSP-PF | RSP-MF | Hilbert-R | CAE | Coh | ICoh | PLI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(A) | |||||||
RSP-PF | 108 | 14 | 12 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
RSP-MF | 66.67% | 21 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hilbert-R | 25.53% | 38.10% | 47 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
CAE | 18.52% | 38.10% | 14.89% | 130 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Coh | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.50% | 2.50% | 40 | 6 | 0 |
ICoh | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 23.1% | 26 | 0 |
PLI | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7 |
(B) | |||||||
RSP-PF | 85 | 11 | 21 | 32 | 7 | 1 | 3 |
RSP-MF | 55.0% | 20 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Hilbert-R | 44.7% | 55.0% | 47 | 14 | 9 | 2 | 1 |
CAE | 40.5% | 55.0% | 29.8% | 79 | 10 | 4 | 4 |
Coh | 17.1% | 5.00% | 21.9% | 24.4% | 41 | 14 | 1 |
ICoh | 2.63% | 0.00% | 5.26% | 10.5% | 36.8% | 38 | 1 |
PLI | 21.4% | 7.14% | 7.14% | 28.6% | 7.14% | 7.14% | 14 |
(A) Common (directly overlapping) connections between methodologies. The diagonal is the total amount of significant (q<0.1) connections for that methodology; the upper triangle is the number of significant common connections between two methodologies; the lower triangle is the percent of significant connections in common, determined by dividing the upper triangle by the diagonal. (B) Common voxels between methodologies. The diagonal is the number of voxels that have at least one significant connection. The upper and lower triangles are the same as A, but for voxels with significant connections instead of the connections themselves.