Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 12.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Med. 2013 May 2;90:40–48. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.04.024

Table 2.

Community characteristics

Mean Median Range
Socioeconomic disadvantage index 0.24 0.25 0.03–0.47
Collective efficacy scale 3.48 3.44 1.80–4.21
Safe in dark 67.7% 75.0% 0%–100%
HH in community has been robbed 45.9% 44.4% 0%–100%
Median HH income $46,837 $38,720 $15,663–$147,224
Less than high school education 36.6% 38.6% 2.3%–76.2%
Female headed household 17.0% 16.7% 2.5%–33.6%
Foreign-born 39.1% 40.2% 11.5%–73.6%
Adults in poverty 18.5% 18.1% 0.01%–45.4%
Neighborhood composition
High Asian/Pacific Islander 11.1%
Predominantly white 16.6%
Hispanic and black 10.9%
Predominantly Hispanic 44.8%
White and other 16.5%
Mean community BMI at wave 1 27.1 26.3 23.2–35.4
Population density (persons/square mile) 15,268 12,881 33–58,086

Source: L.A. FANS waves 1 and 2, Census 2000, and ACS 2005–2009. The items used to construct the socioeconomic disadvantage index (percent female headed household, percent of adults with less than high school education, and percent of adults in poverty) are based are average values of the estimates for the 975 individuals in the sample, who lived in 547 census-tracts. These individual estimates, described on page 6, are based on 2000 Census and 2005–2009 ACS data. Collective efficacy, the neighborhood safety variables, and mean census-tract BMI are based on aggregate responses drawn from the first wave of L.A. FANS, based on 65 census-tracts. Census-tract racial and ethnic composition is based on 2000 Census data alone, based on 65 census-tracts.