Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 12.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Dis Child. 2012 Dec 5;98(4):258–264. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2012-302633

Table 3.

Body composition measures of 156 perinatally HIV-infected South African children suppressed on ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r)-based treatment and randomized to either maintain the LPV/r-based regimen or switch to a nevirapine (NVP)-based regimen (Mean±SD)

Randomization Group
Measure combined
(n=156)
LPV/r
(n=85)
NVP
(n=71)
P-value a
MUAC – Mid Upper Arm Circumference, cm 15.5±2.1 15.8±2.2 15.2±1.9 0.073
MTC – Mid Thigh Circumference, cm 29.7±3.4 30.1±3.8 29.3±2.9 0.143
MWC – Mid Waist Circumference, cm 51.1±3.7 51.4±4.0 50.8±3.5 0.325
MHC – Maximum Hip Circumference, cm 53.9±6.0 54.2±7.3 53.6±4.0 0.556
MWC – MHC Ratio 1.02±1.0 1.08±1.3 0.95±0.1 0.373
BSF – Bicep Skinfold, mm 5.29±1.7 5.67±1.8 4.84±1.5 0.002
TSF – Tricep Skinfold, mm 7.06±1.7 7.24±1.8 6.86±1.7 0.180
SSF – Subscapular Skinfold, mm 6.24±1.7 6.47±1.7 5.97±1.6 0.069
SISF – Suprailiac Skinfold, mm 6.40±2.6 6.58±2.8 6.18±2.2 0.329
USF – Umbilical Skinfold, mm 6.71±4.5 7.01±5.4 6.31±2.9 0.320
MTSF – Mid Thigh Skinfold, mm 9.80±3.2 10.4±3.3 9.1±3.0 0.018
SFS – Skinfold Sum, mm 41.3±10.8 43.0±11.1 39.0±10.1 0.031
%BF = %Body Fat by BIA 15.7±8.0 17.0±7.0 14.1±8.0 0.022
Extremity Fat Area
Arm AFA - Arm Fat Area, cm2 5.5±1.9 5.8±2.1 5.2±1.7 0.078
%AF - % of Fat in Arm 29.0±8.3 29.1±8.3 28.9±8.3 0.837
Leg LFA - Leg Fat Area, cm2 14.8±5.8 15.7±6.0 13.6±5.3 0.023
%LF - %of Fat in Leg 20.7±6.4 21.8±6.7 19.4±5.7 0.023
Regional Fat Proportions of Total Body Fat
Arm [(BSF+TSF) / SFS] 0.30±0.04 0.30±0.05 0.30±0.04 0.734
Trunk [(SSF +SISF+USF) / SFS] 0.46±0.06 0.45±0.06 0.47±0.05 0.114
Leg [MTSF / SFS] 0.24±0.04 0.24±0.04 0.23±0.03 0.046
Trunk-Extremity Skinfold Ratios
Trunk-Arm [(SSF+SISF) / (BSF+TSF+SSF+SISF)] 0.50±0.06 0.50±0.06 0.51±0.05 0.256
Trunk-Leg [(SSF + SISF) / (MTSF + SSF+SISF)] 0.56±0.06 0.55±0.07 0.57±0.05 0.034

Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation

a

LPV/r- and NVP-groups were compared using t-tests