Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 12;10(8):e0132557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132557

Table 3. Summary of suggestions to improve the peer review process and increase speed.

Theme Description Approximate proportion of responses
Deadlines and defined policies Shorted allocated time to review a manuscript and strict procedures to ensure adherence to deadlines 30%
Referee reward system Providing incentives and compensation for reviewers and editors 25%
Editorial persistence Proactivity from editors to send reminders, follow up with deadlines, and setting the tone. 14%
Alternative responses Permitting to submit to more than one journal, include early career researchers as reviewers, follow model of journals that do it well, bank or database of reviewers, have sub-reviewers (e.g. expertise for statistics, methods, taxa, tools, etc.) 13%
Change norms of publishing Author empowerment, journal standardization, open peer review, double blind reviews 12%
Improved journal management Overall management of editorial staff and inter-journal management 6%