Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 12.
Published in final edited form as: J Nutr Health Aging. 2011 Mar;15(3):202–207. doi: 10.1007/s12603-010-0303-7

Table 3.

Mean (95% confidence interval) Cumulative Decline in 3MS Scores Across 11 Years of Follow-up by Categories of RTEC Consumption; Cache County Study on Memory Health and Aging

Years of follow-up
3 (n=2743) 7 (n=1907) 11 (n=1256) Pa
Age-gender adjusted 0.004
Infrequent −0.72 (−1.06, −0.37) −2.38 (−2.94, −1.82) −4.84 (−5.65, −4.04)
Weekly −0.74 (−1.19, −0.30) −2.20 (−2.61, −1.79) −4.21 (−4.78, −3.64)
Daily −0.88 (−1.32, −0.44) −2.70 (−3.36, −2.05) −5.27 (−6.03, −4.50)
Multivariable adjusted b 0.0009
Rarely −0.68 (−1.03, −0.33) −2.25 (−2.82, −1.67) −4.57 (−5.39, −3.74)
Weekly −0.72 (−1.17, −0.26) −2.10 (−2.47, −1.72) −3.96 (−4.18, −3.57)
Daily −0.89 (−1.33, −0.44) −2.67 (−3.37, −1.96) −5.13 (−6.09, −4.35)
a

p-value for the interaction terms for time and RTEC; this value is an indicator of the statistical significance of whether cognitive trajectories by RTEC consumption category differ by period of observation

b

Adjusted for age, gender, education level, BMI, ever smoker, ever drinker, frequency of moderate physical activity per week, history of myocardial infarct, stroke, and diabetes, index of help needed with daily activities, marital status, time, time*time and interactions between time and RTEC frequency category.