Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 12;31(3):659–678. doi: 10.1007/s10899-014-9455-4

Table 3.

Multinomial logistic regressions of gambling problems (reference category: non-gambling, OR = 1)

Independent variables Non-problem gambling Risk-problem gambling
B OR (95 % CI) B OR (95 % CI)
Demographica
 Gender (male) .199 1.22 (0.98–1.52) 1.09** 2.98 (1.98–4.49)
 Living situation (lives not with both parents) .113 1.12 (0.89–1.40) .283 1.33 (0.90–1.95)
 Place of birth (Norway) .187 1.21 (0.71–2.06) −.214 0.81 (0.38–1.72)
 Ethnicity (Norwegian) .179 1.20 (0.70–2.04) −.431 .631 (0.30–1.31)
Personalityb
 Extraversion .024 1.02 (0.88–1.20) −.035 0.97 (0.74–1.27)
 Agreeableness −.199* 0.82 (0.68–.984) −.376* 0.69 (0.51–0.92)
 Conscientiousness −.088 0.92 (0.78–1.08) .143 1.15 (0.87–1.53)
 Neuroticism −.139 0.87 (0.75–1.02) .058 1.06 (0.81–1.38)
 Intellect/imagination −.213* 0.81 (0.66–1.00) −.328 0.72 (0.50–1.03)
 Impulsivity .068** 1.07 (1.02–1.12) .176** 1.19 (1.11–1.29)
 Sensation seeking .297 1.35 (0.94–1.92) 1.36** 3.89 (2.08–7.29)
Motivationalc
 Attitudes toward gambling .032** 1.03 (1.02–1.05) .060** 1.06 (1.03–1.09)
 Future gambling intentions .235** 1.27 (1.11–1.45) .667** 1.95 (1.62–2.34)
 Knowledge .086 1.09 (0.97–1.22) .475** 1.61 (1.28–2.01)
Sociald
 Parental monitoring −.133 0.88 (0.73–1.05) −.676** 0.51 (0.38–0.67)
 Father’s education (lower secondary) .404* 1.50 (1.05–2.14) .632* 1.88 (1.06–3.34)
 Mother’s education (lower secondary) −.088 0.92 (0.59–1.42) −.436 0.65 (0.29–1.42)
 Family cohesion .059 1.06 (0.84–1.34) .171 1.19 (0.80–1.77)
 Family gambling history
  Gambled in lifetime .169 1.18 (0.82–1.72) −.189 0.83 (0.41–1.67)
  Gambled once a month −.163 0.85 (0.48–1.50) .175 1.19 (0.45–3.16)
  Gambled once a week −.652 0.52 (0.27–1.01) −.941 0.39 (0.13–1.17)
  Pathological gambling 1.48* 4.39 (1.29–14.89) 3.09** 21.95 (4.37–110.26)
 Family/friends’ approval .417** 1.52 (1.27–1.82) 1.21** 3.35 (2.44–4.59)
Healthe
 HADS anxiety −.006 0.99 (0.96–1.03) .028 1.03 (0.97–1.09)
 HADS depression .012 1.01 (0.97–1.06) .117** 1.12 (1.05–1.21)
 Loneliness −.016 0.98 (0.95–1.02) −.047 .954 (0.90–1.01)

OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval

 p < .10; * p < .05; ** p < .01

a R 2 = .026 (Nagelkerke); Model χ 2 (8) = 39.26, p < .001

b R 2 = .062 (Nagelkerke); Model χ 2 (14) = 91.13, p < .001

c R 2 = .104 (Nagelkerke); Model χ 2 (6) = 162.71, p < .001

d R 2 = .097 (Nagelkerke); Model χ 2 (18) = 147.70, p < .001

e R 2 = .011 (Nagelkerke); Model χ 2 (6) = 16.01, p < .05