Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 30;2015:293868. doi: 10.1155/2015/293868

Table 1.

Quality assessment of the included studies checklist from questions from National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) 1–8: (1) Is case series collected in more than one center? (2) Is the hypothesis/aim/objective of the study clearly described? (3) Are the inclusion and exclusion criteria clearly reported? (4) Is there a clear definition of the outcomes reported? (5) Were data collected prospectively? (6) Is there an explicit statement that patients were recruited consecutively? (7) Are the main findings of the study clearly described? (8) Are outcomes stratified? Abbreviations: ABS = abstract; NA = not applicable (abstract); PCS = prospective case series; RCS = retrospective case series.

Authors Study type Study design Year Location Quality assessment of included studies
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Lai et al. [56] RCS Development 2015 Taiwan No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes

Ito et al. [66] RCS Development 2014 Japan No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes

Wu et al. [57] PCS Development
Validation
2014 Taiwan No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Luo et al. [35] RCS Development
Validation
2013 China No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes

Lee et al. [31] RCS Development
Validation
2013 Korea No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes

Basoglu and Tasbakan [15] RCS Development
Validation
2012 Turkey No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes

Tofts et al. [58] RCS Development
Validation
2012 USA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Schiza et al. [44] RCS Development
Validation
2011 Greece No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No

Anees [63] PCS Validation 2010 USA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Choi et al. [19] RCS Development
Validation
2010 Korea No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes

Akahoshi et al. [13] PCS Development
Validation
2009 Japan No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Chuang et al. [20] PCS Development
Validation
2008 Taiwan No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No

El Solh et al. [59] RCS Development
Validation
2007 USA No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes

Loredo et al. [34] PCS Development
Validation
2007 USA No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No

Skomro et al. [47] RCS Development
Validation
2007 Canada No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No

Torre-Bouscoulet et al. [50, 51] RCS Development
Validation
2007
2009
Mexico No Yes Yes No No No Yes No

Panagou et al. [64] ABS Development 2005 Greece NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Rowley et al. [43] RCS Development
Validation
2005 USA No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes

Stradling et al. [48, 49] RCS Development
Validation
2004 Britain No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes

Lin et al. [32] PCS Development
Validation
2003 Taiwan No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Akashiba et al. [14] PCS Development
Validation
2001 Japan No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No

Sériès [45] PCS Development
Validation
2000 Canada No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Nahmias et al. [65] ABS Development 1995 USA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Teschler et al. [60] PCS Development
Validation
1995 Germany No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes

Hoheisel and Teschler [61] ABS Development 1994 Germany NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Miljeteig and Hoffstein [38] PCS Development
Validation
1993 Canada No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes