Table 2.
Correlations of TCI, BDI 2, and MBI-GS.
| TCI NS | TCI HA | TCI RD | TCI P | TCI SD | TCI C | TCI ST | BDI 2 | MBI exhaustion | MBI professional efficacya | MBI cynicism | MBI total score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCI NS | x | −0.385### | 0.144### | −0.191### | n.s. | n.s. | 0.152## | −0.111# | −0.091** | −0.075* | −0.082* | −0.106** |
| TCI HA | −0.441### | x | 0.092** | −0.102** | −0.542### | −0.198### | n.s. | 0.547### | 0.424### | 0.310### | 0.364### | 0.474### |
| TCI RD | n.s. | n.s. | x | n.s. | n.s. | 0.417### | 0.253### | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | −0.080* | n.s. |
| TCI P | −0.211### | n.s. | n.s. | x | n.s. | n.s. | 0.123# | n.s. | 0.093** | −0.100** | n.s. | n.s. |
| TCI SD | 0.150* | −0.586### | n.s. | 0.107* | x | 0.359### | −0.110# | −0.665### | −0.430### | −0.363### | −0.481### | −0.551### |
| TCI C | n.s. | −0.149* | 0.422### | 0.112* | 0.339### | x | 0.083* | −0.257### | −0.187### | −0.131## | −0.283### | −0.262### |
| TCI ST | 0.225### | −0.173# | 0.199## | n.s. | n.s. | 0.109* | x | 0.150### | 0.136## | −0.071* | n.s. | n.s. |
| BDI 2 | −0.180# | 0.516### | n.s. | n.s. | −0.599### | −0.113* | n.s. | x | 0.591### | 0.325### | 0.525### | 0.628### |
| MBI exhaustion | −0.127** | 0.315### | n.s. | 0.101* | −0.277### | −0.125* | n.s. | 0.359### | x | 0.214### | 0.609### | 0.803### |
| MBI prof. efficacya | −0.213### | 0.285### | n.s. | −0.113* | −0.343### | n.s. | −0.206### | 0.333### | 0.173# | x | 0.259### | 0.649### |
| MBI cynicism | n.s. | 0.185## | −0.222### | n.s. | −0.342### | −0.277### | n.s. | 0.284### | 0.448### | 0.304### | x | 0.861### |
| MBI total | −0.177# | 0.350### | −0.180# | n.s. | −0.435### | −0.214### | −0.128** | 0.441### | 0.700### | 0.689### | 0.809### | x |
aScores on MBI efficacy have been inverted to allow easier interpretation of the scales meaning for general burnout.
*p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01; ***p ≤ 0.001; #p ≤ 0.00076; ##p ≤ 0.00015; ###p ≤ 0.000015 (adjusted for multiple comparison).
Coefficients with gray shading describe numbers for the patient sample, numbers without shading coefficients for the employees. Due to multiple testing (66 comparisons), the alpha-levels for significant results were adjusted to p = 0.00076, p = 0.00015, and p = 0.000015 according to Bonferroni correction. Significant results after correction are printed bold. Results have been corrected for age. All coefficients were calculated separately for the female and the male subsample. Results showed no significant differences depending on gender.