Table 4.

Results of the path analyses comparing MBI sum score and BDI 2 for the employee sample.

Model	CMIN	X2/df	df model	p model	CFI	Difference test X2 (unrestricted model)
Unrestricted model	201.984	25.248	8	<0.001	0.918	–
Novelty seeking same for BDI and MBI	205.522	22.836	9	<0.001	0.917	n.s.
Harm avoidance same for BDI and MBI	285.203	31.689	9	<0.001	0.883	X2 = 83.219; p < 0.001
Reward dependence same for BDI and MBI	210.461	23.385	9	<0.001	0.915	X2 = 8.477; p = 0.004
Persistence same for BDI and MBI	219.060	24.340	9	<0.001	0.911	X2 = 17.076; p < 0.001
Self-directedness same for BDI and MBI	404.068	44.896	9	<0.001	0.833	X2 = 202.084; p < 0.001
Cooperativeness same for BDI and MBI	202.046	22.450	9	<0.001	0.918	n.s.
Self-transcendence same for BDI and MBI	218.567	24.285	9	<0.001	0.911	X2 = 16.583; p < 0.001
All subscales same for BDI and MBI	791.272	52.751	15	<0.001	0.672	X2 = 589.288; p < 0.001

The table shows the fit of a liberal model (unrestricted model) compared to nested models, which assume the same regression weights between an individual TCI dimension and burnout/depression, while all other respective dimensions stay free (compare Materials and Methods). Furthermore, a model, which assumes the same regression weights for all dimensions, is tested.