Table 7.

Results of the path analyses comparing MBI subscale scores with each other and with the BDI 2 (patient sample).

	Novelty seeking same	Harm avoidance same	Reward dependence same	Persistence same	Self- directedness same	Cooperativeness same	Self- transcendence same
BDI 2 vs. MBI exhaustion	n.s.	X2 = 24.093; p < 0.001	n.s.	X2 = 11.609; p = 0.001	X2 = 87.025; p < 0.001	X2 = 5.945; p = 0.015	n.s.
BDI 2 vs. MBI professional efficacy	n.s.	X2 = 29.575; p < 0.001	n.s.	X2 = 16.857; p < 0.001	X2 = 79.893; p < 0.001	X2 = 4.450; p = 0.035	X2 = 5.128; p = 0.024
BDI 2 vs. MBI cynicism	n.s.	X2 = 29.813; p < 0.001	n.s.	X2 = 14.957; p < 0.001	X2 = 77.653; p < 0.001	X2 = 7.329; p = 0.007	n.s.
MBI exhaustion vs. MBI professional efficacy	X2 = 5.365; p = 0.021	X2 = 7.944; p = 0.005	n.s.	X2 = 13.247; p < 0.001	X2 = 5.406; p = 0.020	n.s.	X2 = 8.536; p = 0.003
MBI exhaustion vs. MBI cynicism	n.s.	X2 = 7.435; p = 0.006	n.s.	X2 = 4.906; p = 0.027	X2 = 6.438; p = 0.011	n.s.	n.s.
MBI professional efficacy vs. MBI cynicism	n.s.	n.s.	n.s.	n.s.	n.s.	X2 = 8.023; p = 0.005	n.s.

Once again, an unrestricted model was compared to nested models (compare Tables 4 and 5). Here, only X² values and p-values (X² difference test) for the respective path comparison are presented.