Table 2.
Metabolic risk factors | Female n = 79 | Male n = 47 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
OR (95 % CI) P value | OR (95 % CI) P value | OR (95 % CI) P value | OR (95 % CI) P value | |
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 1 | Model 2 | |
Systemic hypertension | 0.66 (0.32 – 1.37) 0.27 | 0.59 (0.28 – 1.26) 0.17 | 1.12 (0.52 – 2.40) 0.75 | 0.95 (0.43 – 2.06) 0.90 |
Hyper trigliceridemia | 1.31 (0.81 – 2.12) 0.27 | 0.61 (0.29 – 1.29) 0.20 | 0.89 (0.48 – 1.66) 0.72 | 0.94 (0.43 – 2.05) 0.88 |
Hypoalpha lipoproteinemia | 2.13 (1.26 – 3.50) 0.004 | 1.33 (0.80 – 2.20) 0.26 | 0.92 (0.50 – 1.71) 0.81 | 0.71 (0.37 – 1.36) 0.30 |
Diabetes Mellitus | 0.81 (0.38 – 1.71) 0.58 | 0.74 (0.34 – 1.60) 0.45 | 0.98 (0.41 – 2.32) 0.96 | 0.74 (0.28 – 1.92) 0.74 |
Metabolic Syndrome | 1.46 (0.89 – 2.37) 0.12 | 1.45 (0.75 – 2.79) 0.26 | 1.05 (0.57 – 1.94) 0.85 | 1.12 (0.45 – 2.78) 0.79 |
Obesity | 1.52 (0.92 – 2.51) 0.09 | 1.44 (0.86 – 2.41) 0.15 | 2.89 (1.55 – 5.30) 0.001 | 2.85 (1.51 – 5.40) 0.001 |
SAF p > 75 | 1.49 (0.91 – 2.43) 0.11 | 1.81 (0.88 – 3.71) 0.10 | 1.50 (0.77 – 2.92) 0.22 | 0.46 (0.16 – 1.30) 0.14 |
VAF p > 75 | 1.29 (0.77 – 2.15) 0.37 | 1.15 (0.60 – 2.22) 0.66 | 1.62 (0.83 – 3.16) 0.15 | 1.14 (0.48 – 2.67) 0.75 |
TAF p > 75 | 1.19 (0.72 – 1.96) 0.49 | 0.93 (0.40 – 2.17) 0.88 | 1.30 (0.67 – 2.51) 0.43 | 0.38 (0.13 – 1.14) 0.08 |
Increased IMT | 2.38 (1.35 – 4.10) 0.003 | 2.62 (1.47 – 4.60) 0.001 | 0.81 (0.32 – 2.04) 0.66 | 0.78 (0.30 – 1.99) 0.60 |
All associations were tested using logistic regression
Adjustment model = M 1 = age, current smoking, alcohol intake, physical activity, marital status
Adjustment model = M 2 = Model 1 + Systolic BP, HDL-C, LDL-C, TG and Glucose
Hipertriglyceridemia = TG >150 mg/dl, Hipoalphalipoproteinemia = HDL <40 mg/dl in men and < 50 mg/dl in women, SAF = Subcutaneous abdominal fat, VAF = Visceral abdominal fat, TAF = total abdominal fat and IMT = Intima media thickness